Why Microsoft must give away security software

By Dana Blankenhorn | Jun 29, 2009 |

Users who are scrupulous about using anti-viral software can still watch their PCs crash and burn as “malware” and viruses become one and the same.

That’s why Microsoft has begun a beta-test of Microsoft Security Essentials, which will combine anti-virus and anti-malware functions, possibly putting some good tool makers out of business.

Staying safe online is no longer as simple as loading an anti-viral at start-up. In addition to malware dressed for special occasions, crooks put malware into useful utilities like those automating Twitter feeds. The Windows Registry has also been horribly abused, creating a mini-industry of registry clean-up tools.

Ralph Kirkland, whom I depend on to take care of my own PC, said while clearing out my latest malware attack that it’s also important to keep all your software up to date, not just your security software, because hackers are constantly finding holes and developers are constantly patching them.

Why can’t we get a permanent fix?

It’s part of the binary nature of computing. Perfect Internet security would also give governments total cyber power over their citizens. If there were no way around the software security countries like Iran and China could put a complete lid on the cyber activities of their people.

A technology like IPv6 , under which every phone, router, and PC could have its own Internet address, might let us audit the origin of malware more effectively, but it’s just as likely those trying to evade the cyber cops would quickly find ways to get around it, delivering a different IP number on every session.

And if you’re running a Mac or Linux, don’t think you lack a dog in this fight. It’s the obscurity of those operating systems, not their built-in security, that seems to make them immune. If everyone were a Mac-head, in other words, you’d be as busy fighting these battles as the rest of us.

How do you keep yourself cyber safe?

 
Reply to Story

SmartPlanet TalkbackShare your ideas and expertise on this topic

Subscribe to this discussion via RSS

  •  
    1

    Dietrich T. Schmitz

    06/29/09 | Report as spam

    You are so wrong.

    "It?s the obscurity of those operating systems, not their built-in security, that seems to make them immune."

    And time will show that Linux is secure by design.

    BTW Dana, how's that Linux installation going? wink

    When you start using it, don't hesitate to post up questions about anything you don't understand. We're here to help! wink

    Dietrich T. Schmitz

  •  
    2

    DanaBlankenhorn

    06/29/09 | Report as spam

    I like Linux

    We really should test my theory in the real world and have Linux get 90% of the desktop market share and Windows 2%. Then we would know which of us was right.

    Thanks for writing.

The following tags are supported in Smartplanet comments:
<b></b> <i></i> <u></u> <pre></pre>

Leave a Reply

  1. Name: You are currently: a Guest |
advertisement

Quick Poll

advertisement
Click Here
advertisement
Click Here
advertisement

John Dodge

John Dodge has answered the call of journalism for 33 years, most of the time covering technology, engineering and business. While he's run magazines, newsweeklies and web sites, reporting and writing always took up half his time. He has have plied his craft at the WSJ, Boston Globe, PC Week (now eWeek), EDN, Design News, Electronic Business, Bio-IT World, Health-IT World, the Lowell Sun, Haverhill Gazette and Newburyport Daily News. He would have like to have been around when Boston supported seven or more newspapers (1940s) and while steam locomotives still pulled trains, but that era was nearly over by the time he raced into the world. That said, he has been blogging and shooting and editing video, writing for web and other online contents tasks for years now.

He has won numerous journalism awards in the past two years, including two Eddie Golds, one Neal finalist and the IEEE Award for Distinguished Journalism all for his reporting and coverage of the Boeing 787 Dreamliner.

Besides his family and myriad hobbies, reporting and writing is why he gets up in the morning. His personal blog focuses on netbooks and is called The Dodge Retort.

John Dodge

John Dodge prides himself on completely independent journalism. His opinions, observations and reporting are not influenced by any financial holdings. He holds no shares in computer, electronics, software or Internet companies. He also has no business affiliations with organizations except with those for which he creates content as a freelancer.

Dana Blankenhorn

Dana Blankenhorn has been a business journalist for nearly 25 years and has covered the online world professionally since 1985. He founded the Interactive Age Daily for CMP Media, and has written for the Chicago Tribune, Advertising Age's "NetMarketing" supplement, and dozens of other publications over the years.

Dana Blankenhorn

Dana Blankenhorn has been a technology reporter since 1982, a business reporter since 1978, and a writer for as long as he can remember. His Schwab IRA has a few tech stocks in it, most notably some Intel and Applied Materials bought over 10 years ago. But the vast majority of his tiny fortune (emphasis on the word tiny) is invested in mutual funds. He presently writes for no one else but ZDNet, SmartPlanet and himself. But if you've got an opportunity let him know. If he takes the gig he"ll first add it to this disclosure page.
The Thinking Tech blog focuses on technologies such as virtualization, smart electric grids, enterprise 2.0, open source, data center management, green technology and the intersection between the innovation and application of these advancements.