Who will get evolution moving forward?

SmartPlanet TalkbackShare your ideas and expertise on this topic

Subscribe to this discussion via RSS

•  
  1

  dedrizen

  08/03/09 | Report as spam

  Natural selection needs us to get out of the equation

  First, I will qualify that I don't follow the philosophy, or belief system, known as evolution. That being said, I do agree that mankind has seriously done damage to the natural order of things. We've destroyed predators critical to the health of various populations of animals, all because we thought to protect the prey. Now natural selection is out of balance and sick animals that would have been food are now the very stock that propagates the next generation. We try to correct with hunting or other means of destroying numbers of animals. We even apply methods of reducing reproduction. These new methods of intervening only seem to make the situation worse. Instead of talking of moving forward evolution, I would suggest we talk about restoring the lost balance. Unfortunately, we need to remember that a lot of intervention has only made things worse. If we truly want balance, we have to accept that not everything will be perfect. Why? Because it seems the more we try to force perfection upon nature, the more we do just the opposite and destroy the balance. So, some species will be lost. Some predators might not be suitable to be returned to the environments they once occupied, as we may have altered the environment beyond what once worked for them. I do believe we should take responsibility for our mistakes. We should try and find a new balance from what once was. I just don't want us to try and enforce evolution. Do we want to be the Hitlers of the animal kingdom? He gave a bad name to enforced human evolution.

•  
  2

  JTF243@...

  08/03/09 | Report as spam

  Dana shoots his mouth off - - AGAIN

  When you state that "Hunters kill the young, the strong, the beautiful", you demonstrate once more that you are speaking of something of which you have NO PERSONAL KNOWLEDGE! Hunters do NOT take the young as the young do not have the size or growth that we desire and admire. Most of the larger game animals taken are the older, larger specimens, many of which are nearing the end of their lives. In many instances, some hunters choose to harvest an animal that has already deteriorated from its peak, clearing out the old, the weak, or the sick, in much the same way that other predators would, if they were around.
  Some hunters even choose to take those older animals as they frequently display traits that make them truly unique. But, even if they harvest an animal in its prime, the hunters are only able to do that if the animal has done something STUPID! That removes them from the gene pool which then benefits the rest of the animals as the smarter ones survive.
  Man was told that we have "dominion" over the earth and, in removing so many of the predators that we used to view as "competitors", we must now take action to replace the predators with ourselves. With the way that we have overwhelmed their habitats, re-introducing those predators in many areas is NOT FEASIBLE because, as many in California are learning to their dismay, the predators find easier pickings in US and our PETS than in their natural prey.
  Dana, it's time for you to SIT DOWN AND SHUT YOUR MOUTH!!!