Virtual receptionists replacing the real thing

By John Dodge | Feb 15, 2010 |

Clearly a victim of tough economic times and improved phone forwarding and answering technology, receptionists have succumbed to the virtual world. In the flesh, they are hard to find.

Receptionist "Pam Beasly" from The Office. credit: Fibers.com

Receptionist Pam Beesly in "The Office" is fictional in more ways than one. credit: Fibers.com

And so are numbers that attest to their dwindling ranks. Let’s face it, working as a receptionist is usually low-paying and stressful during busy times.

But the phone still needs answering so filling in the gap are “virtual receptionists” in the form of Internet-based software.  While the human interaction is lost,  virtual receptionists have some features live ones do not.

When was the last time a real receptionist texted you about an important call? Or worked 24/7 (there’s labor laws against that)? A virtual receptionist works for peanuts and doesn’t demand benefits.

eVoice, for instance ($12.95 a month after a six-month free trial), emphasizes more than automated routing and answering. Its demo video shows a dad taking that all important call at his kid’s soccer game. “The new service finds me wherever I go,” he says. It also gives the illusion that he has an office when clearly he doesn’t.

There are others: the Onebox receptionist, VoicseShot and DaVinci Virtual Receptionist. There’s also remote answering services that might be 3,000 miles away from you. One posits the idea of “virtual live receptionists” while an oxymoron, appears to be a real receptionist, but who’s far away.

This begs the question: will the office be the next to go? Cheap, available and proven technology that allows us to stay in touch with action central and dispersed employees has been around for years. But the maxim that nothing replaces face-to-face contact still held until this latest recession. The thing to do until 3-5 years ago was get on a plane and visit your customers or in my case as a journalist, sources.

Now that’s considered expensive, time-consuming and a hassle if it involves flying. With receptionists, face-to-face contact, apparently, is just not worth the money. Boston Globe blogger Scott Kirsner recently rued the passing of the profession in a post “Where have all the receptionists gone?” His final point in the post gives one pause and reminds me of the legendary receptionist Betty Edwards who greeted everyone with a smile at newsweekly PCWeek (now eWeek) for more than 20 years:

“The last time I was visiting VistaPrint’s U.S. headquarters in Lexington, Mass. (May 2009), I took this photo of the receptionist’s desk, mostly because I liked her title: “Director of   First Impressions.” I hope that Dottie is still there…,” Kirsner wrote.

Ironically, VistaPrint has its own virtual receptionist product called RingCentral. I looked for Vistaprint’s main phone number to see if Dottie is still there, but could not find anything but an 800-customer number. It’s Washington’s Birthday so I assume if I called, the virtual director of first impressions would come on the line.

Follow me on Twitter.

 
Reply to Story

SmartPlanet TalkbackShare your ideas and expertise on this topic

Subscribe to this discussion via RSS

  •  
    1

    dougogd@...

    02/17/10 | Report as spam

    Yes and this kind of thinking has also removed customer service....

    Try to get through and talk to an actual person when you need to and you will find it almost impossible, and if you have a problem you need to talk to get something corrected just forget about it and pay the bill regardless of whether you have the extra $10,000 to pay it with. They don't care they just want to save a penny by using a machine that will never get you to a real person. Then people stop doing business with them because their service is poor and they blame the economy. When it was their own stupidity that caused the problem in the first place.

  •  
    2

    rygelski

    06/29/10 | Report as spam

    RE: Virtual receptionists replacing the real thing

    I continue to use the live thing at www.phonewire.com. It may cost a little bit more, but its still cheaper than a full time employee and my customers never get frustrated with unnecessary IVR menus. Think about it: Only a few automated attendents are designed well, but for the majority everyone just keeps pressing 0 until they get to a person because that's what people really want is another human being.

The following tags are supported in Smartplanet comments:
<b></b> <i></i> <u></u> <pre></pre>

Leave a Reply

  1. Name: You are currently: a Guest |
advertisement
advertisement

Quick Poll

advertisement
Click Here
advertisement

Deborah Gage

Contributing Editor, Technology

I've been a journalist for nearly 20 years, not counting the high school and college newspapers I edited, and I keep doing it because I love the work. Most of my time has been spent covering business and technology out of Silicon Valley -- most recently for the San Francisco Chronicle -- but I've also covered politics for Minnesota Public Radio and worked for magazines, Web sites and other newspapers.

My work has won over a dozen national awards over the years, including the Neal Award and Grand Neal. The story I'm most proud of was an investigation for Baseline magazine of American-made software that was exported to Panama and malfunctioned, which caused 28 patients at Panama's National Cancer Institute to be overdosed with radiation. The hospital assumed the workers who operated the machine were responsible, and they were charged with second-degree murder. Their case was ongoing the last time I checked.

I do have a family, which includes five cats, and I ride road bikes and practice Yoga so I remember to get out of my desk chair and away from my computer once in awhile.

She writes for SmartPlanet and is not an employee of CBS.

Follow her on Twitter.

Deborah Gage

I pride myself on being an independent journalist. My reporting and writing are not influenced by any financial holdings, and I have no business affiliations with companies other than the publishers I write for as a journalist.

She writes for SmartPlanet and is not an employee of CBS.

Dan Nosowitz

Contributing Editor, Technology

Dan Nosowitz is based in San Francisco, where he covers Silicon Valley, consumer electronics, green tech and the influence of technology on our daily lives. Formerly a contributing editor at Gizmodo, he is also a correspondent for Fast Company and founder and editorial director of Oh Em Gee., a pop culture criticism collective based in Montreal.

A native of Philadelphia, Nosowitz has an undergraduate degree in English literature from McGill University in Montreal. He spends most of his time on a pink leatherette loveseat in his San Francisco sunroom.

He writes for SmartPlanet and is not an employee of CBS.

Follow him on Twitter.

Dan Nosowitz

Dan Nosowitz does not hold any investments in the technology companies he covers.

He writes for SmartPlanet and is not an employee of CBS.

The Thinking Tech blog focuses on technologies such as virtualization, smart electric grids, enterprise 2.0, open source, data center management, green technology and the intersection between the innovation and application of these advancements.