The real value in anti-WiFi paint

By Dana Blankenhorn | Oct 6, 2009 |

Forget the snarky comments about “secure your WiFi with paint.”

(Picture from CNET’s Crave blog.)

The development of an aluminum oxide paint that resonates at high frequencies by researchers at the University of Tokyo has good, solid practical uses.

This paint lets us mold wireless networks so they work where we want them to, and don’t work where they might create interference.

The obvious first beneficiaries are going to be hospitals.

Hospitals have been building-out sophisticated WiFi networks for a decade now. They handle voice as well as data traffic. Many sophisticated medical devices run on WiFi frequencies, or bands near them.

Now these high bandwidth applications can be protected. Just paint the outside of the radiology department with this new paint, at just $16 per kilogram, and the problem is solved. Those devices are now isolated from the rest of the building and have access to the whole frequency band.

That last is as important as the security angle. Isolating WiFi networks gives each network access to the whole frequency band, with minimal sharing. Integrating wired and wireless networking with this new paint means more throughput where you need it.

You can still have WiFi wherever you want it. Just add a wire with a wireless router. Secure that router’s IP number and you can track whatever is happening on that bandwidth.

This means you can have consumer WiFi in the waiting rooms, while doctors can be using the same frequencies in other locations without fear of violating privacy.

Many businesses have long faced the choice between enabling delicate communications within the executive suite and keeping their business secure. Paint the outside of the suite, make it an island, and you can run the data. Instead of having a sea of WiFi, have a set of lakes and ponds you can control. Plus each pond gets access to the full frequency band.

Molding a network to a corporate campus, a university campus, or a hospital campus has been impossible until now. Now it’s possible.

You’re not really paying for the bits on your WiFi connection, and a logical separation between your own network and that connection should let you share it. You’re certain to be held harmless if, without your knowledge, some hoser does something untoward with bandwidth on your router — were that not the case coffee shops could not exist.

But molding a wireless network to the physical contours of the location where it’s designed to run — that’s cool.

 
Reply to Story

SmartPlanet TalkbackShare your ideas and expertise on this topic

Subscribe to this discussion via RSS

  •  
    1

    dwsimpso

    10/06/09 | Report as spam

    This could be a God-send

    It seems today that people seem to feel that cell phone/texting/emailing is a God-given right to be exercised whenever and wherever they want.

    You are in a movie, and people are talking and texting on cells. In church cells phones are in use. I sing in the choir, and not too long ago a cell phone rang, and we could hear, "I can't talk now because I'm in church". You go to a public meeting, and people are constantly using their cells/Blackberry. You are in the library, and people are talking on their cells. You are on the train, and the guy next to you is yelling into his cell so he can be heard, driving you nuts. The person at the next table in a nice restaurant is having an argument with someone on his cell phone. THIS IS A REAL PROBLEM.

    I went to a large public meeting recently where the speaker told people to turn off their cell phones. He told them FOUR times in a row. 10 minutes later a cell phone rang, and he had the person escorted forcefully from the meeting, and some of the others were outraged that the speaker was not nicer!

    We need cell-phone free zones.

  •  
    2

    Mike106132000@...

    10/06/09 | Report as spam

    RE: The real value in anti-WiFi paint

    I think baking foil under wallpaper would do just as good a job. 
    My house had scaffolding around it for a while. It held the WiFi signal
    in; giving a better signal around the house and blocked signals out.



  •  
    3

    DanaBlankenhorn

    10/06/09 | Report as spam

    There is aluminum here

    It's in the form of aluminum oxide. This particular formulation resonates with higher frequencies than the tin foil hat you put on your house. (Sorry for the snark -- couldn't resist. Didn't mean anything by it. I'm just overcome by rim shot itis sometimes...)

  •  
    4

    Darr247

    10/06/09 | Report as spam

    RE: The real value in anti-WiFi paint

    The newscientist.com article linked at the top of this story says existing paints shield up to 48GHz already. That should work fine for free WiFi (2.4GHz ISM and 5GHz UNII bands), and even most cell phone traffic (900MHz to 3GHz). Why isn't THAT readily available to help mitigate overcrowding of the 3 non-overlapping channels in the 2.4GHz band?

  •  
    5

    Jkirk3279

    10/06/09 | Report as spam

    RE: The real value in anti-WiFi paint

    Uhm, would this work on a car to block reflectance of radar
    waves?

    IIRC, someone already thought of that, and the Pentagon shut
    him down.

    You'd use this paint on top of the primer coat, and maybe
    sprinkle in some nano-scale antennas grown on tiny crystals.

    They'd absorb the radar and re-emit it on lower frequencies.

    Thus, no radar bounceback.

  •  
    6

    Jim Johnson

    10/06/09 | Report as spam

    Umm, is the paint optically clear?

    I'm sure this paint would help, but Most people like having a window to the outside world. Interior industrial doors often use glass panels to make sure the path is clear before opening a door. And GHz frequency RF passes fairly easily through untreated glass.

    This stuff would certainly help, but so long as I can look up from my desk and see the cell tower down the road... Or look through the glass in the door and see the hospital's antennas down the corridor...

  •  
    7

    pjher

    10/08/09 | Report as spam

    Windows!

    This would only work on rooms, houses, workplaces without
    windows.
    Therefore practically no use at all.
    Unless we all want to live in bunkers.

The following tags are supported in Smartplanet comments:
<b></b> <i></i> <u></u> <pre></pre>

Leave a Reply

  1. Name: You are currently: a Guest |
Related Smart Video

All Video »

advertisement

Quick Poll

advertisement
Click Here
advertisement
Click Here
advertisement

John Dodge

John Dodge has answered the call of journalism for 33 years, most of the time covering technology, engineering and business. While he's run magazines, newsweeklies and web sites, reporting and writing always took up half his time. He has have plied his craft at the WSJ, Boston Globe, PC Week (now eWeek), EDN, Design News, Electronic Business, Bio-IT World, Health-IT World, the Lowell Sun, Haverhill Gazette and Newburyport Daily News. He would have like to have been around when Boston supported seven or more newspapers (1940s) and while steam locomotives still pulled trains, but that era was nearly over by the time he raced into the world. That said, he has been blogging and shooting and editing video, writing for web and other online contents tasks for years now.

He has won numerous journalism awards in the past two years, including two Eddie Golds, one Neal finalist and the IEEE Award for Distinguished Journalism all for his reporting and coverage of the Boeing 787 Dreamliner.

Besides his family and myriad hobbies, reporting and writing is why he gets up in the morning. His personal blog focuses on netbooks and is called The Dodge Retort.

John Dodge

John Dodge prides himself on completely independent journalism. His opinions, observations and reporting are not influenced by any financial holdings. He holds no shares in computer, electronics, software or Internet companies. He also has no business affiliations with organizations except with those for which he creates content as a freelancer.

Dana Blankenhorn

Dana Blankenhorn has been a business journalist for nearly 25 years and has covered the online world professionally since 1985. He founded the Interactive Age Daily for CMP Media, and has written for the Chicago Tribune, Advertising Age's "NetMarketing" supplement, and dozens of other publications over the years.

Dana Blankenhorn

Dana Blankenhorn has been a technology reporter since 1982, a business reporter since 1978, and a writer for as long as he can remember. His Schwab IRA has a few tech stocks in it, most notably some Intel and Applied Materials bought over 10 years ago. But the vast majority of his tiny fortune (emphasis on the word tiny) is invested in mutual funds. He presently writes for no one else but ZDNet, SmartPlanet and himself. But if you've got an opportunity let him know. If he takes the gig he"ll first add it to this disclosure page.
The Thinking Tech blog focuses on technologies such as virtualization, smart electric grids, enterprise 2.0, open source, data center management, green technology and the intersection between the innovation and application of these advancements.