The cellphone radiation controversy takes a new turn

By Dana Blankenhorn | Jan 8, 2010 |

The sudden firing of head football coach Jim Leavitt for going all George Patton on one of his players is not the biggest controversy this week on the campus of the University of South Florida in Tampa.

That honor goes to Gary Arendash at the school’s Alzheimer’s Disease Research Center, who reports that mice exposed to cell phone radiation lost some of the beta amyloid plaques in their brain and gained relief from the animal version of Alzheimer’s Disease.

Arendash got his exposure by building a big mouse condo of plastic boxes containing mice bred with a gene making them prone to the disease, and exposing them for two hours per day to a centrally-located antenna blasting radiation at cell phone frequencies, with enough power to simulate holding the phone to the head.

(Looks a bit like the condo I stayed at in Chengdu, China last year, where I borrowed WiFi from the neighbors.)

His press release at the Journal of Alzheimer’s Disease gushed:

“If we can determine the best set of electromagnetic parameters to effectively prevent beta-amyloid aggregation and remove pre-existing beta amyloid deposits from the brain, this technology could be quickly translated to human benefit against Alzheimer’s Disease” said USF’s Chuanhai Cao, PhD, the other major study author. “Since production and aggregation of beta-amyloid occurs in traumatic brain injury, particularly in soldiers during war, the therapeutic impact of our findings may extend beyond Alzheimer’s disease.”

Now just wait a gul-durn gol-darn, the research community responded. Scientists have been looking at cell phones as a possible cancer cause for over a decade. It can’t possibly be a cure for Alzheimer’s. Can it?

“This is nonsense,” said the editor of Alzheimer’s & Dementia, which is out with a new study linking dietary supplements to improvement in patient cognition.

Or is it?

Two years ago researchers at the University of Sunderland in England claimed they could reverse Alzheimer’s with a helmet that bathed the patient’s head in infrared (left). Infrared light is an electromagnetic frequency. Cell phones are a higher electromagnetic frequency.

Obviously the only thing we know for certain right now is that Dr. Arendash’s job prospects at this point look better than those of Coach Leavitt. (Can you say grant proposal? I know you can.)

Arendash himself admits he was surprised by his results. Tests are needed of a variety of frequencies, at a variety of strengths, to see if there is something therapeutic here.

Some of those tests are going on right now, albeit without controls, inside your own head. We have all been absorbing increasing amounts of radiation, at a wide variety of frequencies, since the dawn of radio a century ago. Our iPhones and the wireless web just increase the load.

Is it possible that Alzheimer’s isn’t an inevitable result of aging on Earth? Call me and let’s talk about it.

I’ll be on my cell.

 
Reply to Story

SmartPlanet TalkbackShare your ideas and expertise on this topic

Subscribe to this discussion via RSS

  •  
    1

    Duke E. Love

    01/10/10 | Reported as spam

    Fark you 4ssh0le

    Got diabetes yet you fat fark?

  •  
    2

    dadhog

    01/11/10 | Reported as spam

    RE: The cellphone radiation controversy takes a new turn

    "... Infrared light is an electromagnetic frequency. Cell phones are a higher electromagnetic frequency."

    Who wrote this crap?!?

  •  
    3

    zclayton3

    01/11/10 | Report as spam

    RE: The cellphone radiation controversy takes a new turn

    Infrared is indeed an electromagnetic frequency. The radio band however is lower in frequency, not higher. the spectrum is from higher to lower, Gamma/x-ray, extreme UV, UV, visible light, IR, far IR, and then radio frequencies. It continues on down farther, but that is not this discussion.

  •  
    4

    Dr_Zinj

    01/11/10 | Report as spam

    Actually, it might just work

    You'd want an e-m frequency that was capable of breaking up the plaques without adversely effecting any of the other structures of the brain.

    Beta amyloid is a peptide of 39?43 amino acids. Normally beta amyloid is removed from the body of health people, but it accumulates in people with Alzheimer's.

    Every molecule has a certain unique resonant frequency at which it can be disrupted by electo-magnetic radiation. Assuming the particular e-m radiation is penetrating, you could bust the peptide into smaller, easily handled amino acids, and that would eliminate one of the symptoms of Alzheimer's.

  •  
    5

    dbell@...

    01/11/10 | Report as spam

    Re: Dr_Zinj - "It just might work"

    Aside from the very reasonable point about each molecule having a characteristic frequency, the quote sounds too much like Gene Wilder in 'Young Frankenstein'!

    Dave

  •  
    6

    anplymoth

    01/11/10 | Report as spam

    What?

    "Every molecule has a certain unique resonant frequency at which it can be disrupted by electo-magnetic radiation. Assuming the particular e-m radiation is penetrating, you could bust the peptide into smaller, easily handled amino acids, and that would eliminate one of the symptoms of Alzheimer's."

    "You're just not thinking fourth dimensionally!
    Right, right. I have a real problem with that. "

  •  
    7

    famulla

    01/12/10 | Reported as spam

    RE: The cellphone radiation controversy takes a new turn

    No matter what cell you talk of, have you ever considered the elite purchases and the power of the poor purchasing? After all, who brings the cell corporations? The elite, who may request the golden cell made in the pure hide and warranty for life, help desk at the click. Do you seriously think the corporation will survive? No. It is the lower ends like the Apple computer and IBM that had to bring down the computer prices as Micheal Dell opened the doors for , " Come on buy these from my warehouse" At the factory price. Moreover, who leads now? DELL right. It is the price and the poor who keep these corporations floating. Elite will buy one and that is it then they will have cheaper ones for the house cleaner, drivers, and wives (You will spoil these) Your government is spying on you.
    Although in this era of military satellites and closed circuit surveillance cameras that may not come as a big surprise, conspiracy theorists believe there's a lot more to it. Believers point to the Patriot Act?s broadening of intelligence agencies? powers to put Americans under surveillance ?- without a warrant ?- and monitor phone calls and Internet usage as red flags.
    But the paranoia, whether justified or not, doesn?t stop there. Fringe groups point to the nationwide high-definition TV conversion upgrade as little more than a pretext to get boxes with government monitoring chips into every living room in the country. Big Brother can spy on you through your iPhone, BlackBerry or cell phone, and that GPS box in your car is a two- way line to the satellite.
    I thank you
    Firozali A Mulla DBA

  •  
    8

    econaj

    01/12/10 | Reported as spam

    RE: The cellphone radiation controversy takes a new turn

    famulla got lost once the reaper came by and destroyed the corn maze he was in.

  •  
    9

    Jkirk3279

    01/12/10 | Report as spam

    RE: The cellphone radiation controversy takes a new turn

    Not impossible.

    We know that these amyloid protein tangles accumulated
    aluminum.

    We know that aluminum absorbs microwaves.

    It's possible that the slight amount of microwaves from the
    cell phone experiment heated the aluminum, just enough
    to break up the amyloid tangles... voila?!

    No more Alzheimers.

  •  
    10

    goatfarmer

    01/13/10 | Report as spam

    RE: The cellphone radiation controversy takes a new turn

    What an absurd opening sentence.

  •  
    11

    calin24x7@...

    01/20/10 | Report as spam

    RE: The cellphone radiation controversy takes a new turn

    The statement " Cell phones are a higher electromagnetic frequency (then infrared light)"

    The statement above is wrong:light, even infrared has a higher freqyuency than the cellphones frequencies:
    Low frequency infrared (far infrared is approx 500 to 3000 GHz (up to 3 THz whwreas cellophone frequency is 800 MHz to 1.8 GHZsome 1000 times lower

  •  
    12

    calin24x7@...

    01/20/10 | Report as spam

    RE: The cellphone radiation controversy takes a new turn

    Sorry, goatfarmer, what exactly is wrong with this opening statement?
    To me it seems pretty accurate but perhas I am missing something?
    Please advise

  •  
    13

    thejdawg569_2000@...

    01/22/10 | Report as spam

    RE: The cellphone radiation controversy takes a new turn

    what could it hurt a mind is a terrible thing to waste and if your a democrat you need all the help you can get

  •  
    14

    pgit

    01/25/10 | Report as spam

    riiiight...

    I spit a big gulp of my mercury hexafluoride all over the keyboard when I read this...

  •  
    15

    Too-Tired Techie

    01/25/10 | Report as spam

    RE: The cellphone radiation controversy takes a new turn

    Hmmm, there was a guy named Royal Rife who invented the Dark Field Microscope. Claimed he was able to selectively kill off different microorganisms - including cancer cells - by vibrating them with electromagnetic fields tuned to their resonant frequencies. The neat thing about his microscope (Google it) is it allowed real-time viewing of LIVE cells at electron-microscope resolutions, thereby allowing him to see what frequencies worked in real-time. Of course his work was bashed to hell and back and he was hounded to his death. It wouldn't have been profitable for Big Medicine if his methodology had seen the light of day and been shown to actually save lives. Another one bites the dust... So here we are in the 21st century and we are still using barbaric, hugely expensive things like Radiation, Chemo and surgery, with dismal results.

  •  
    16

    femtobeam@...

    01/26/10 | Report as spam

    RE: The cellphone radiation controversy takes a new turn

    This study is exactly the opposite of what happens. Cell phone radiation concentrates heavy metals like mercury in brain cells, trapping them there where they produce toxins, kill and deform braincells and cause cancer and Alzheimers. This type of disinformation is aimed at promoting a large market penetration of cell phone equipment to monitor brain waves, not cure disease. It seems there is always an Oriental name associated with these fake studies, just as China announced a monopoly and shutdown of Rare Earth Elements REE used to manufacture these products.

  •  
    17

    martian@...

    01/26/10 | Report as spam

    Great...

    Now you can get cancer and be able to remember it...

    sad

  •  
    18

    flodur2@...

    01/28/10 | Report as spam

    RE: The cellphone radiation controversy takes a new turn

    I sit near the router for the local network. Maybe that'll save me from getting a mental disease but I may develop a brain tumor.

  •  
    19

    zorb43@...

    02/10/10 | Report as spam

    RE: The cellphone radiation controversy takes a new turn

    Yes,I'll agree with the argument ..... partially. Back in the day, it was considered a natural part of aging. Today, it appears people feel the need to blame what ails them on technology because they believe it has lagged so far behind in bringing about any real cures for various diseases. They are correct insomuch as cancer and similar cell mutating processes within the body seem to the average person to be no closer to a cure today than they were a hundred years ago; not to mention the infective and invasive procedures we currently employ to attempt to cure or slow the process of mutant cell replication and other malfunctions of the human body.

The following tags are supported in Smartplanet comments:
<b></b> <i></i> <u></u> <pre></pre>

Leave a Reply

  1. Name: You are currently: a Guest |
advertisement
Click Here

Quick Poll

advertisement

John Dodge

John Dodge has answered the call of journalism for 33 years, most of the time covering technology, engineering and business. While he's run magazines, newsweeklies and web sites, reporting and writing always took up half his time. He has have plied his craft at the WSJ, Boston Globe, PC Week (now eWeek), EDN, Design News, Electronic Business, Bio-IT World, Health-IT World, the Lowell Sun, Haverhill Gazette and Newburyport Daily News. He would have like to have been around when Boston supported seven or more newspapers (1940s) and while steam locomotives still pulled trains, but that era was nearly over by the time he raced into the world. That said, he has been blogging and shooting and editing video, writing for web and other online contents tasks for years now.

He has won numerous journalism awards in the past two years, including two Eddie Golds, one Neal finalist and the IEEE Award for Distinguished Journalism all for his reporting and coverage of the Boeing 787 Dreamliner.

Besides his family and myriad hobbies, reporting and writing is why he gets up in the morning. His personal blog focuses on netbooks and is called The Dodge Retort.

John Dodge

John Dodge prides himself on completely independent journalism. His opinions, observations and reporting are not influenced by any financial holdings. He holds no shares in computer, electronics, software or Internet companies. He also has no business affiliations with organizations except with those for which he creates content as a freelancer.

Dana Blankenhorn

Dana Blankenhorn has been a business journalist for nearly 25 years and has covered the online world professionally since 1985. He founded the Interactive Age Daily for CMP Media, and has written for the Chicago Tribune, Advertising Age's "NetMarketing" supplement, and dozens of other publications over the years.

Dana Blankenhorn

Dana Blankenhorn has been a technology reporter since 1982, a business reporter since 1978, and a writer for as long as he can remember. His Schwab IRA has a few tech stocks in it, most notably some Intel and Applied Materials bought over 10 years ago. But the vast majority of his tiny fortune (emphasis on the word tiny) is invested in mutual funds. He presently writes for no one else but ZDNet, SmartPlanet and himself. But if you've got an opportunity let him know. If he takes the gig he"ll first add it to this disclosure page.
The Thinking Tech blog focuses on technologies such as virtualization, smart electric grids, enterprise 2.0, open source, data center management, green technology and the intersection between the innovation and application of these advancements.