GridWeek puts spotlight on the smart grid and its challenges

By John Dodge | Sep 18, 2009 |

The smart grid’s movers and shakers will gather next week in the nation’s capitol for GridWeek whose speaker list includes such luminaries as DOE secretary Sam Chu and Commerce secretary Gary Locke. Workload permitting, I hope to be there.

The Smart Grid has the attention of vendors, utilities and policy makers but speaking as a consumer, I’m still waiting for it to trickle down to me. I have the same dumb mechanical electric meter that was installed when our  house was built 17 years ago (I went down and checked to see if National Grid surreptitiously swapped the mechanical clunker out for a smart meter. No such luck).

What is GridWeek all about? Here it is in a nutshell: “A realization is emerging that a new view of energy, beyond oil, coal and other fossil based fuels, will result in decentralized components of the electricity grid, a far cry from the central generation and structured system of the past.” The folks gathering there will try to make this vision happen.

It sounds great and the commitment to build it is strong, but the usual obstacles stand in the way, some unique to the utilities and the energy industry and others commonplace such as enough funds to make it happen with the urgency everyone wants. To discuss these issues, I caught up by phone with Mark Hura, GE’s smart grid commercial leader with the company’s Energy Transmission and Distribution division.

GE is unique because its product and service portfolio runs across the electricity value chain from start to finish. It either makes or develops transformers, smart appliances, entire generation systems for power plants, smart meters, batteries, grid control software and energy automation products. Siemens is the only other company I can think of with similar depth and breadth in energy, but I am sure there are others.

As a result, GE’s products touch a lot of customer types. But at the end of day, the utilities and its customers are GE’s primary constituency, according to Hura.

“Our customer is the utility that owns and operates that grid,” he says. One GE goal is to use technology that lowers cost so the savings can be passed onto consumers. He estimates the smart grid can lower today’s energy bills by between 10 and 15 per cent. What’s more, the smart grid will be essential to handle renewable energy and power smart appliances such as electric cars and those in the home. Also, the old grid happens to be crumbling under today’s loads and would collapse under tomorrow’s.

One major disconnect is that smart grid savings is mostly on the generation and transmission sides where the cost is born by the energy distribution to homes and businesses. Distribution is where the smart grid network will be built and will use smart meters.

Years ago, utilities owned all the pieces, but they have split themselves up over the years as the result of deregulation.

“A lot of investment is incurred on the distribution side, but the benefits are experienced in generation and transmission,” says Hura, adding there’s has to be “critical incentives to invest.”

Utilities are facing revenue reduction from the decreased demand which compounds the problem (I am trying to reconcile decreased demand with projections that electricity consumption will double, triple and even quadruple in the future). No doubt, utilities for now are being encouraged to get their customers to use less, hence generating lower revenues. And the recession has taken a toll.

That’s why the $43 billion in Stimulus money for energy and the smart grid is so important. Hura thinks  money from the feds is not coming fast enough, though.

“The government is doing a lot in terms of raising awareness, but it needs to act with speed and not on trials but on scalable deployments [that can be grown and replicated]. How can the government reward utilities for efficiency?” he asks.

Policy also needs to encourage decoupling where electricity production is separated from revenue generation so output can be aligned with what’s needed. Decoupling helps utilities invest in smart grids and renewable energy sources and at the same time assures “the utility will have a steady revenue stream,” says Hura. (Think about it: what other industries besides those in energy work so hard to get customers to use less of their product?)

Another thing he helped clear up for me is relationship of the smart grid to the Internet and whether it will be a “1,000 times the size of the Internet” as some claim.

“The smart grid is synonymous with the Internet and has similarities in terms of information and IP [addresses]. That’s why it’s like the Internet, but it’s not the Internet. If you want to think of it in that way, it’s really an energy Internet,” he said.

He declined to comment on how big it could become, but revealed it could eventually be used for non-energy purposes such as delivering broadband-like Internet access to the home. Wouldn’t more competition in that space be nice?

The video below is an excellent overview of the smart grid from the IEEE, the electrical engineering association.

Follow me on Twitter.

 
Reply to Story

SmartPlanet TalkbackShare your ideas and expertise on this topic

Subscribe to this discussion via RSS

  •  
    1

    mheartwood

    09/18/09 | Report as spam

    RE: GridWeek puts spotlight on the smart grid and its challenges

    Three years ago, the local utility replaced our old mechanical meter with a smart meter. I was pleased. No more meter readers knocking on the door and needing to be lead down into the basement where the meter was. Accurate readings every month, and none of those silly estimated readings which were always way off. The utility saved a pile of money moving to the smart meters. Regulation and monitoring of the local grid became easier. It made so much economic sense for everyone involved, even in a regulated market like Ontario, Canada.

    I now live in a rural village. We're prone to power interruptions. Everyone has UPSes and back -up generators. When the power goes out, the utility knocks on everyone's door to find out if they have power or are on back-up, just so they can locate the damaged lines. The pamphlets arrived this summer. By this time next year, everyone in the county will have a smart meter. It likely means I can expect fewer brown outs and black outs, or at least shorter ones when they do occur. It means the repair people can more quickly and easily locate breakages and fix them. The utility expects that this change over alone will cut a third off of their maintenance costs, while ensuring better service for everyone. (Rural areas are more difficult for the meters than urban areas which is why the delay in their installation.) Sure it costs a lot, but the utility expects a Return on Investment of under 3 years.

    I'm still in Ontario. The price of electricity is still regulated below market value. And yet, the utilities are seeing a smart grid to be to their economic advantage, a means of increasing their profits. It's a short-term investment with a big pay-off.

    And then I come across an article like this one and I'm forced to ask: "Why are your utilities dragging their feet?"


The following tags are supported in Smartplanet comments:
<b></b> <i></i> <u></u> <pre></pre>

Leave a Reply

  1. Name: You are currently: a Guest |
advertisement

Quick Poll

advertisement

John Dodge

John Dodge has answered the call of journalism for 33 years, most of the time covering technology, engineering and business. While he's run magazines, newsweeklies and web sites, reporting and writing always took up half his time. He has have plied his craft at the WSJ, Boston Globe, PC Week (now eWeek), EDN, Design News, Electronic Business, Bio-IT World, Health-IT World, the Lowell Sun, Haverhill Gazette and Newburyport Daily News. He would have like to have been around when Boston supported seven or more newspapers (1940s) and while steam locomotives still pulled trains, but that era was nearly over by the time he raced into the world. That said, he has been blogging and shooting and editing video, writing for web and other online contents tasks for years now.

He has won numerous journalism awards in the past two years, including two Eddie Golds, one Neal finalist and the IEEE Award for Distinguished Journalism all for his reporting and coverage of the Boeing 787 Dreamliner.

Besides his family and myriad hobbies, reporting and writing is why he gets up in the morning. His personal blog focuses on netbooks and is called The Dodge Retort.

John Dodge

John Dodge prides himself on completely independent journalism. His opinions, observations and reporting are not influenced by any financial holdings. He holds no shares in computer, electronics, software or Internet companies. He also has no business affiliations with organizations except with those for which he creates content as a freelancer.

Dana Blankenhorn

Dana Blankenhorn has been a business journalist for nearly 25 years and has covered the online world professionally since 1985. He founded the Interactive Age Daily for CMP Media, and has written for the Chicago Tribune, Advertising Age's "NetMarketing" supplement, and dozens of other publications over the years.

Dana Blankenhorn

Dana Blankenhorn has been a technology reporter since 1982, a business reporter since 1978, and a writer for as long as he can remember. His Schwab IRA has a few tech stocks in it, most notably some Intel and Applied Materials bought over 10 years ago. But the vast majority of his tiny fortune (emphasis on the word tiny) is invested in mutual funds. He presently writes for no one else but ZDNet, SmartPlanet and himself. But if you've got an opportunity let him know. If he takes the gig he"ll first add it to this disclosure page.
The Thinking Tech blog focuses on technologies such as virtualization, smart electric grids, enterprise 2.0, open source, data center management, green technology and the intersection between the innovation and application of these advancements.