CompuTex is not Comdex

By Dana Blankenhorn | Jun 4, 2009 |

I started off the week writing that Comdex lives in Taiwan.

In fact CompuTex is not Comdex. This became clear to me over the last two days, while talking with CompuTex buyers.

(Leonard Nimoy called his first autobiography I Am Not Spock. He called his second, to the right, I Am Spock. Proof positive that you only learn when you change your mind.)

Many buyers in Taiwan this week were like the old Comdex crowd. They were looking for solutions.

The difference between Comdex and CompuTex is they were not finding solutions. Only parts.

Consider the Aussie I met in a cab today. He works for a reconstruction outfit. If a car runs into your house his guys come out, work up an estimate, then bid the job, saving the smaller ones for themselves.

What he wanted, he said, was a way to speed his process. Right now his estimators may go on six calls a day, talking into Dictaphones, taking photographs, working up gross estimates. Then they have to come in and spend a day finding bidders and getting the ball rolling.

We talked about ways you can speed things up. Ditch the Dictaphone and e-mail a sound file. Use tablets to complete forms that can also be e-mailed, with pictures as attachments. Then have the office collecting bids and starting work before the estimators get back. Cut the turnaround time in half.

Intriguing, he said, but what he has works. He is really just looking at gear that can improve things on the margins.

That’s because transformation takes software. It takes systems. Someone has to write to the API, someone has to produce an integrated set of forms, or form-writing tools, that can be used to get the job done in a new way.

In the old Comdex days there were VARs who did this. Some exhibited, others did not. You could get your hands on software that would, in time, deliver your solution.

At CompuTex it’s just pieces. It’s hardware. It’s like seeing tools without seeing the machine.

In America, this solutions business has moved online, with telephone support and real people coming out to the big accounts. But because so much of our hardware comes from Taiwan and China there is a disconnect between what the software people are doing and what the hardware is capable of.

Microsoft is taking advantage of this. Windows is about the only software system these OEMs understand. So Microsoft developers will, within a few weeks, be developing with CompuTex’ hardware capabilities, and within some months will start selling the results.

After my cab ride I felt a bit like my Aussie friend. There are immense profits to be had in putting this hardware together with new concepts around software and networking. But all I’m seeing are pieces, and a few players walking away with all the margin.

This was the message Jim Zemlin had for CompuTex attendees. With open source new hardware combinations are possible. With open source new solutions can be written before CompuTex, with today’s hardware makers becoming tomorrow’s brand names.

In computing everything is about building new business models that squeeze out the margins of someone else, capturing them for new players.

Someone is going to figure out how to turn CompuTex into Comdex. That someone is going to make a lot of money.

 

Smartplanet TalkbackShare your ideas and expertise on this topic

The following tags are supported in Smartplanet comments:
<b></b> <i></i> <u></u> <pre></pre>

Leave a Reply

  1. Name: You are currently: a Guest |
advertisement

Quick Poll

advertisement

John Dodge

John Dodge has answered the call of journalism for 33 years, most of the time covering technology, engineering and business. While he's run magazines, newsweeklies and web sites, reporting and writing always took up half his time. He has have plied his craft at the WSJ, Boston Globe, PC Week (now eWeek), EDN, Design News, Electronic Business, Bio-IT World, Health-IT World, the Lowell Sun, Haverhill Gazette and Newburyport Daily News. He would have like to have been around when Boston supported seven or more newspapers (1940s) and while steam locomotives still pulled trains, but that era was nearly over by the time he raced into the world. That said, he has been blogging and shooting and editing video, writing for web and other online contents tasks for years now.

He has won numerous journalism awards in the past two years, including two Eddie Golds, one Neal finalist and the IEEE Award for Distinguished Journalism all for his reporting and coverage of the Boeing 787 Dreamliner.

Besides his family and myriad hobbies, reporting and writing is why he gets up in the morning. His personal blog focuses on netbooks and is called The Dodge Retort.

John Dodge

John Dodge prides himself on completely independent journalism. His opinions, observations and reporting are not influenced by any financial holdings. He holds no shares in computer, electronics, software or Internet companies. He also has no business affiliations with organizations except with those for which he creates content as a freelancer.

Dana Blankenhorn

Dana Blankenhorn has been a business journalist for nearly 25 years and has covered the online world professionally since 1985. He founded the Interactive Age Daily for CMP Media, and has written for the Chicago Tribune, Advertising Age's "NetMarketing" supplement, and dozens of other publications over the years.

Dana Blankenhorn

Dana Blankenhorn has been a technology reporter since 1982, a business reporter since 1978, and a writer for as long as he can remember. His Schwab IRA has a few tech stocks in it, most notably some Intel and Applied Materials bought over 10 years ago. But the vast majority of his tiny fortune (emphasis on the word tiny) is invested in mutual funds. He presently writes for no one else but ZDNet, SmartPlanet and himself. But if you've got an opportunity let him know. If he takes the gig he"ll first add it to this disclosure page.
The Thinking Tech blog focuses on technologies such as virtualization, smart electric grids, enterprise 2.0, open source, data center management, green technology and the intersection between the innovation and application of these advancements.