Arguing for NASA’s exploration of deep space

By John Dodge | Jun 15, 2009 |

The longstanding debate in space exploration whether to focus on earth orbital or probe deep space with manned flights took center stage last week at MIT’s Giant Leaps Symposium celebrating the 40th anniversary of Apollo 11.

There’s no mistaking where Apollo 11 astronaut Edwin “Buzz” Aldrin stands.

“We need to establish pathways to permanent residence of another planet,” said the second human to walk on the moon. “The moon is good place to do that. We need a new vision for space exploration.” Some even think we should skip the moon and conduct more research on Mars.

The Shuttle focused on earth orbit exploration.

The Shuttle focused on earth orbit exploration.

Former astronaut and last American to walk on the moon Harrison “Jack” Schmitt shares  Aldrin’s view. In fact, he says the fate of manned deep space exploration was sealed even before Apollo 11 lifted off the launchpad on July 16, 1969. And that was planning for the de-commissioning of the huge Saturn V booster that hurled the Apollo astronauts into deep space, i.e. to the moon and potentially beyond.

Where do we spend: deep space or earth orbital?

The Saturn V booster pushed man into deep space.

“We need a heavy launch lift vehicle. The moon does that for us,” he said in an interview.  Apollo 17 was the last manned space flight outside the earth’s orbit. That was 37 years ago. NASA has three unused Saturn V boosters because it had bought enough of them to use through a planned Apollo 20, according to Schmitt. “They should have been used,” he said, adding their “operators” liked them but the “managers” advocating for the Space Shuttle didn’t.

Unfortunately, NASA took a hit last week when House appropriators cut 16% from the President’s 2010 budget request with manned space flight bearing the brunt of the reductions. The good news for manned space flight is that President Obama a few weeks ago selected former Space Shuttle astronaut Charles F. Bolden to head NASA.

However many Apollo luminaries at the conference such as Mission Control legend Chris Kraft, JFK speedwriter Ted Sorensen and former Grumman CEO Joe Gavin who oversaw development of the Apollo 11 Lunar Module “Eagle” or LEM which stands for Lunar Excursion Module (some excursion!) agreed that manned space flight demands wide support from the President, Congress and the public.

“When there’s an accident like Columbia, you actually see public support go up. The national media is not continuously interested in the space program so the public doesn’t normally have information about it. Congress reacts to the next election,” says Schmitt who supports long term space flight. Schmitt also served a senator of New Mexico from from 1977-83.

The assembled acknowledged that the stars aligned for Apollo program and Gemini and Mercury before it.  The Cold War, Sputnik, a dynamic new president in John F. Kennedy and the foundation for NASA laid by
his predecessor Dwight D. Eisenhower galvanized the country. And the space program took our collective mind off the mounting disaster which was Vietnam.

In one session Dr. David Danielson, program manager of DOE’s Advanced Research Projects Agency and founder of the now burgeoning MIT Energy Club, said he was already planning a Giant Leaps conference 40 years hence to identify the “astronauts who would transform our energy” supply.

“What will have been their Sputnik?” he asked.  Schmitt just might have identified the next Sputnik for the space program.

China is going to the moon.”

Follow me on Twitter and friend me at Facebook.

 
Reply to Story

SmartPlanet TalkbackShare your ideas and expertise on this topic

Subscribe to this discussion via RSS

  •  
    1

    marie curie

    10/28/09 | Report as spam

    RE: Arguing for NASA's exploration of deep space

    Nice for Nasa but I do not like ?China is going to the moon.?
    Many Chinese is not good. If they be stronger, they will make the war with some country weaker.

The following tags are supported in Smartplanet comments:
<b></b> <i></i> <u></u> <pre></pre>

Leave a Reply

  1. Name: You are currently: a Guest |
advertisement

Quick Poll

advertisement
Click Here
advertisement
Click Here
advertisement

John Dodge

John Dodge has answered the call of journalism for 33 years, most of the time covering technology, engineering and business. While he's run magazines, newsweeklies and web sites, reporting and writing always took up half his time. He has have plied his craft at the WSJ, Boston Globe, PC Week (now eWeek), EDN, Design News, Electronic Business, Bio-IT World, Health-IT World, the Lowell Sun, Haverhill Gazette and Newburyport Daily News. He would have like to have been around when Boston supported seven or more newspapers (1940s) and while steam locomotives still pulled trains, but that era was nearly over by the time he raced into the world. That said, he has been blogging and shooting and editing video, writing for web and other online contents tasks for years now.

He has won numerous journalism awards in the past two years, including two Eddie Golds, one Neal finalist and the IEEE Award for Distinguished Journalism all for his reporting and coverage of the Boeing 787 Dreamliner.

Besides his family and myriad hobbies, reporting and writing is why he gets up in the morning. His personal blog focuses on netbooks and is called The Dodge Retort.

John Dodge

John Dodge prides himself on completely independent journalism. His opinions, observations and reporting are not influenced by any financial holdings. He holds no shares in computer, electronics, software or Internet companies. He also has no business affiliations with organizations except with those for which he creates content as a freelancer.

Dana Blankenhorn

Dana Blankenhorn has been a business journalist for nearly 25 years and has covered the online world professionally since 1985. He founded the Interactive Age Daily for CMP Media, and has written for the Chicago Tribune, Advertising Age's "NetMarketing" supplement, and dozens of other publications over the years.

Dana Blankenhorn

Dana Blankenhorn has been a technology reporter since 1982, a business reporter since 1978, and a writer for as long as he can remember. His Schwab IRA has a few tech stocks in it, most notably some Intel and Applied Materials bought over 10 years ago. But the vast majority of his tiny fortune (emphasis on the word tiny) is invested in mutual funds. He presently writes for no one else but ZDNet, SmartPlanet and himself. But if you've got an opportunity let him know. If he takes the gig he"ll first add it to this disclosure page.
The Thinking Tech blog focuses on technologies such as virtualization, smart electric grids, enterprise 2.0, open source, data center management, green technology and the intersection between the innovation and application of these advancements.