Dana Blankenhorn

Rethinking Healthcare

AP screws up antibiotics-birth defect story

By Dana Blankenhorn | Nov 3, 2009 |

The Associated Press is running a super-scary headline today. “Study ties common antibiotics to birth defects.”

The truth is quite different. We are not talking about first-line antibiotics. Penicillins, erythromycins and cephalosporins have no impact on birth defects. We are not talking here of “common antibiotics.”

We’re talking about two specific antibiotics, sulfonamides (sometimes called sulfa drugs),  and nitrofurantoins, used by only 1 in 100 pregnant women.

These did seem to result in a higher rate of birth defects and scientists want to know why.

Among the better known sulfanomides, to which many people are already alerted by allergies, are Bactrim and Sulfatrim.  They are most commonly prescribed for staph infections and in some cases of pneumonia.

Nitrofurantoins are usually used against urinary tract infections, and go by brand names like Macrobid and Macrodantin.

Here is how the study worked.

CDC researchers analyzed 13,155 cases of 30 different birth defects, drawn from the National Birth Defects Prevention Study. These were compared to 4,941 controls, women located in the same geographical areas whose babies had no birth defects.

What the authors want is more study on why these results occurred. There is really no need to panic, unless you get your news from AP.

Here is their conclusion in full:

“Determining the causes of birth defects is problematic. A single defect can have multiple causes, or multiple seemingly unrelated defects may have a common cause. This study could not determine the safety of drugs during pregnancy, but the lack of widespread increased risk associated with many classes of antibacterials used during pregnancy should be reassuring.”

Not all medical scares are caused by conflicting scientific studies or new insights. Some are caused by sloppy headlines.

 
Reply to Story

SmartPlanet TalkbackShare your ideas and expertise on this topic

Subscribe to this discussion via RSS

  •  
    1

    JimboNobody

    11/04/09 | Report as spam

    Everyone has a bias

    Unfortunately, in addition to sensationalist reporting, we also sometimes have biased science. This ranges from questionable conclusions (global warming) to outright fabrication. I did post-grad research for a professor who knew what he wanted to prove. When my preliminary statistical analysis ran counter to his conclusion, he told me to "finagle the data". Instead, I dropped out of graduate school. The guys that cooperated with his subterfuge are now tenured professors.

  •  
    2

    mejohnsn

    11/04/09 | Report as spam

    RE: AP screws up antibiotics-birth defect story

    The assertion that "everyone has a bias" is completely out of place here. Blankenhorn has done very much the right thing by decrying AP's sloppy and sensationalist reporting.

    Just as Blankenhorn concludes, there is absolutely no grounds for concern, no grounds for fear that "common antiobiotics cause birth defects". Why even a cursory glance at the inserts included with any of these antibiotics shows that they have been examined for teratological effects. Most show no such tendency, those that have ever showed it, even only in animals, are marked as "not to be prescribed during pregnancy".

    Nitrofurantoin (Macrobid) is NOT so marked: it is marked as "Pregnancy category B", which means, "used during pregnancy only if clearly needed". This even though NO study has shown teratological effects of Nitrofurantoin even in animals.

    BTW: nitrofurantoin (Macrobid) is uniquely benign since it concentrates ONLY in the urinary tract, and has almost no impact anywhere else in the body. That is one reason why side-effects from it are so rare.

    AP really has screwed up here. They should be held responsible.

  •  
    3

    DanaBlankenhorn

    11/11/09 | Report as spam

    The idea that "everyone has a bias" is dangerous

    The idea that "everyone has a bias" is extremely dangerous. It allows you to dismiss scientific conclusions as biased, while taking comfort in denialism -- global warming is a fact, not a grand conspiracy.

    This denialism also lets you turn every decision into a political one, so you follow your political leaders and overthrow the modern world.

    Afghanistan was once part of the modern world. Then they destroyed their environment and came under the spell of religious zealots.

The following tags are supported in Smartplanet comments:
<b></b> <i></i> <u></u> <pre></pre>

Leave a Reply

  1. Name: You are currently: a Guest |
advertisement

Quick Poll

advertisement
Click Here
advertisement
Click Here
advertisement

Dana Blankenhorn

Dana Blankenhorn has been a business journalist for nearly 25 years and has covered the online world professionally since 1985. He founded the Interactive Age Daily for CMP Media, and has written for the Chicago Tribune, Advertising Age's "NetMarketing" supplement, and dozens of other publications over the years.

Dana Blankenhorn

Dana Blankenhorn has been a technology reporter since 1982, a business reporter since 1978, and a writer for as long as he can remember. His Schwab IRA has a few tech stocks in it, most notably some Intel and Applied Materials bought over 10 years ago. But the vast majority of his tiny fortune (emphasis on the word tiny) is invested in mutual funds. He presently writes for no one else but ZDNet, SmartPlanet and himself. But if you've got an opportunity let him know. If he takes the gig he"ll first add it to this disclosure page.
Rethinking Healthcare examines innovation in the health care industry covering topics such as electronic and personal health records, treatment, privacy, regulation and using information technology to manage and monitor chronic conditions.