Withdrawal is cruel, whether it’s from coke or cookies

By Melanie D.G. Kaplan | Nov 11, 2009 |

My friend Dave and I walk our dogs together nearly every afternoon. When I’m in a bad mood, he brings me cookies. When he’s between diets, I bring him baked goods from my oven. We’re dependable enablers. And every few weeks, without fail, he’ll say, “I’m trying this new thing.” Sometimes it’s eating an early, healthy dinner, followed by a cookie reward. Sometimes it’s a different breakfast or zero caffeine or a new workout. This week, he’s cutting out all refined sugar.

I tried to cut out sugar for two weeks last year after an NFL player told me he’d done so during the off-season and felt like a million bucks. He warned me that the withdrawal process would cause headaches at first, but soon, I’d feel infinitely better. Likewise, Dave told me yesterday, he’d had some headaches since he began this diet. I commiserated, and then asked him how long he’d stick with it.

“You tell me,” he laughed, reminding me that he’s been yo-yo dieting since high school. Indeed, I’ve seen Dave diet for a few weeks, only to succumb to his wife’s amazing cupcakes (guilty here, too). Or test out a program that counts calories, only to become so frustrated that he would later double his cookie intake. But through all these cycles, or perhaps because of them, he is more aware than most people of how foods affect him.

So neither of us were surprised to learn about the recent study out of Boston University’s Laboratory of Addictive Disorders, appearing in the Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, that shows depriving oneself of yummy foods (read: sugar, fat, carbs) can cause compulsive eating, similar to the chemical reaction of a drug addiction. The study showed that after rats were deprived of “palatable food” (in this case, sugary, chocolate-flavored rat chow—yum), they would exhibit overeating of this tasty food once they had access again. In fact, they proceeded to binge on it.

As the study progressed over seven weeks, the effect became more pronounced, and the binging rats were eating roughly 20 percent more food when they had access to chocolate chow than rats in the control group (who only had regular rat chow). According to ScienceNOW, the rats going through chocolate chow withdrawal also spent less time in the exposed parts of a specially designed maze, a measure of increased anxiety. When the chocolate chow was returned, the anxiety disappeared.

So not only were they pigging out on chocolate and avoiding the healthier food option, but the rats’ emotional states were affected. This shows the root of the vicious cycle with which yo-yo dieters and drug abusers are all too familiar: cut out pleasurable substance; ache for pleasurable substance; feel awful (physically and mentally) while enduring absence of pleasurable substance; finally give in to pleasurable substance, consuming even more of it than before, to make up for lost time.

So what is a sugar addict to do? Do not run for the cookie jar. Or the chocolate chow bin. Check back tomorrow when I discuss sugar addiction and withdrawal with Greg Lewis, co-author of the new book End Your Addiction Now: A Proven Nutritional Supplement Program That Can Set You Free.

 
Reply to Story

SmartPlanet TalkbackShare your ideas and expertise on this topic

Subscribe to this discussion via RSS

  •  
    1

    sashavinny

    11/11/09 | Report as spam

    RE: Withdrawal is cruel, whether it's from coke or cookies

    Another great post. I am anxiously awaiting tomorrow's topic , since it may hold the key to ending my own sugar addiction. I wonder how many cookies I can eat between now and then ?

  •  
    2

    steve_jonesuk@...

    11/12/09 | Report as spam

    RE: Withdrawal is cruel, whether it's from coke or cookies

    Anyone else find it ironic that a piece so sympathetic about denial
    ends on a cliffhanger? I'll be looking for tomorrow's piece too, but
    with the proviso that it's beginning to sound like an infomercial.

The following tags are supported in Smartplanet comments:
<b></b> <i></i> <u></u> <pre></pre>

Leave a Reply

  1. Name: You are currently: a Guest |
advertisement

Quick Poll

advertisement

Christina Hernandez

Christina Hernandez is an award-winning journalist based in the Philadelphia area. Her work has appeared in the Los Angeles Times, Newsday, the Philadelphia Inquirer, Diverse: Issues in Higher Education, the website of the Columbia Journalism Review and elsewhere. Christina is a graduate of the University of Delaware and Columbia University's Graduate School of Journalism.

Christina Hernandez

Christina Hernandez is an independent journalist whose reporting and observations are not influenced by financial holdings.

Melanie D.G. Kaplan

Melanie D.G. Kaplan is a veteran journalist, traveler and swimmer. She writes regularly for The Washington Post and is a contributing editor at Washington Flyer. She has also written for The New York Times, National Geographic Traveler, People and USA Weekend. Melanie is a graduate of Syracuse University and Columbia University's Graduate School of Journalism. She lives in Washington, D.C. with her beagle Darwin.

Melanie D.G. Kaplan

In addition to working as a journalist, Melanie keeps the dog food fund flush with occasional consulting jobs. In the unusual event that her writing mentions a company or organization for which she has provided editorial services, she will disclose that fact. She will do the same should she cover any companies in which she holds investments.

Pure Genius examines the best moves in the management and strategy trenches and deciphers what we can learn from them. Interviews, videos, guest posts and lessons from not-so-bright management moves will also be included.