Try reading the proposed law.
What you are prattling about is not in the proposed law. It has no more and no less prescription proof requirements than any other US health care law.
And the proof goes to the insurance company. Just like all of us have been doing for decades when our doctor prescibes something.
You give the prescription to the pharmacists who validates your insurance covers it. You pay the co-pay and have your meds. This law does not change that.
You might have heard of the appeal process. If you work for a religious organization that does not cover birth control for religious reasons this proposed law allows you to appeal to have the birth control medicine covered if it is prescribed for a medical condition. Such as the regulation of unusually heavy menstrual cycles.
The federal rules announced recently by the Obama administration do not allow such appeals.
Making this law MORE flexible in helping people get coverage for medical needs. Shocking that a state can actually write a better law than the feds.