Ipad trademark issue
I think this article is little bit missleding. If I remember right, the HK judge did not have the final ruling on the case yet. The preliminary ruling is that Ipad trademark was sold to IP Application not Apple. The means IP Application can use the trademark. If I am the owner of Provision, I will sue IP Application Inc. because it violated the of Trade mark contract by making a competing device, which is Apple's IPad. The sale contract was voided because Apple was violate the non competing clause per contract. If I am the Apple lawyer, I would try to settle this case asap and have Provision to revise the non competing clause.
