<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8" ?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:s="http://www.bnet.com/search" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"  xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
<channel>
    <title><![CDATA[Discussion on How do you measure the world's largest cities? ]]></title>
    <link><![CDATA[http://www.smartplanet.com/forum/discussions/1-9097]]></link>
    <atom:link rel="hub" type="application/rss+xml" href="http://pubsubhubbub.appspot.com/" />
    <atom:link rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" href="http://www.smartplanet.com/forum/discussions/1-9097/rss" />

    <description><![CDATA[]]></description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <lastBuildDate>2013-05-21T03:08:36-07:00</lastBuildDate>
             

    <item>
        <title><![CDATA[Who Cares?]]></title>
        <link><![CDATA[http://www.smartplanet.com/forum/discussions/1-9097-62914]]></link>
        <description><![CDATA[Biggest, largest, most etc, etc. Does it really matter? Cities should be measured by their least impact to their state/province/area. I'm not alluding that they should be measured by their 'greeness' either, as there are too many flaws associated with 'green' designations.]]></description>
        <guid><![CDATA[http://www.smartplanet.com/forum/discussions/1-9097-62914]]></guid>
        <dc:creator><![CDATA[16Tons]]></dc:creator>
        <pubDate>Mon, 30 Jan 2012 10:33:58 -0800</pubDate>
    </item>
    </channel>
</rss>

