<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8" ?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:s="http://www.bnet.com/search" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"  xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
<channel>
    <title><![CDATA[Discussion on Top 10 most innovative cities ]]></title>
    <link><![CDATA[http://www.smartplanet.com/forum/discussions/1-7936]]></link>
    <atom:link rel="hub" type="application/rss+xml" href="http://pubsubhubbub.appspot.com/" />
    <atom:link rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" href="http://www.smartplanet.com/forum/discussions/1-7936/rss" />

    <description><![CDATA[]]></description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <lastBuildDate>2013-05-22T19:54:27-07:00</lastBuildDate>
             

    <item>
        <title><![CDATA[...]]></title>
        <link><![CDATA[http://www.smartplanet.com/forum/discussions/1-7936-56407]]></link>
        <description><![CDATA[Too broad, suspect analytics and incongruent standards of metrics. There's no way to legitimately compare places globally on the metrics listed. An example of this is that Europe effectively pays for everyone to stay in school through graduate education if they want to because people who are in school aren't counted on the unemployment rolls. All the places listed have this and high levels of welfare in common.]]></description>
        <guid><![CDATA[http://www.smartplanet.com/forum/discussions/1-7936-56407]]></guid>
        <dc:creator><![CDATA[Ternarybit]]></dc:creator>
        <pubDate>Tue, 25 Oct 2011 13:52:04 -0700</pubDate>
    </item>
    </channel>
</rss>

