First: Yes, some areas will definitely suffer under "climate
change". But other's will benefit. Think farming in the vast
expanses of Canada.
2nd, arguments about changing coastlines are completely bogus.
Coastal areas are the most temporary features on the planet,
"climate change" or not.
And some of the prognosis is at best, wrong, and at worst, an
outright lie to support the warmist's political agenda:
http://www.bbc.co.uk/news/10222679So why is it that all "change" is "bad"? Change is inevitable, man-
made or not. It just has to be sold as "bad" so that fascists such
as quintasTiberius above can have their way with the rest of us.
(Disclosure: I own neither a Hummer or oil stocks. Only the straw-
men that quintasTiberius and those like him construct of me do
that)
Oh, and how ironic that it's our eco-agenda that is partially
responsible for Amazon deforestization so that they can grow
more corn to make of for the corn we now use to make ethanol
instead of food to export. Just another example of the unintended
consequences of the eco-fascist agenda.
