You know, there are also benefits to "warming".
Why do the warm-mongers only focus on the negative?
The "famine" argument is bogus. Although already marginal
regions will undoubtably suffer, longer growing seasons and more
rain means in increase in global agricultural output elsewhere.
riverat1, the 3-6 feet number has always been considered
extreme. 3 feet alone, which is at the high end of what is
considered credible, would be consistent with the trend since the
last ice age.
And quintasTiberius, I'm glad you take responsibility for your
"concentration camp" statement. (Since you put it in writing, it
would have been silly for you to do otherwise) Please keep it up.
It's revealing behavior like that which makes it all the easier to
show people what the fascist warming agenda is really about.
