<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8" ?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:s="http://www.bnet.com/search" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"  xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
<channel>
    <title><![CDATA[Discussion on France's latest green idea: underwater nuclear reactors ]]></title>
    <link><![CDATA[http://www.smartplanet.com/forum/discussions/1-5135]]></link>
    <atom:link rel="hub" type="application/rss+xml" href="http://pubsubhubbub.appspot.com/" />
    <atom:link rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" href="http://www.smartplanet.com/forum/discussions/1-5135/rss" />

    <description><![CDATA[]]></description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <lastBuildDate>2013-05-22T14:12:14-07:00</lastBuildDate>
             

    <item>
        <title><![CDATA[Good Lord!]]></title>
        <link><![CDATA[http://www.smartplanet.com/forum/discussions/1-5135-80431]]></link>
        <description><![CDATA[Sounds like a wonderful combination of the Gulf Coast Disaster and Fukushima. What can they be thinking?]]></description>
        <guid><![CDATA[http://www.smartplanet.com/forum/discussions/1-5135-80431]]></guid>
        <dc:creator><![CDATA[James Mooney]]></dc:creator>
        <pubDate>Mon, 08 Oct 2012 21:46:08 -0700</pubDate>
    </item>
             

    <item>
        <title><![CDATA[RE: France's latest green idea: underwater nuclear reactors]]></title>
        <link><![CDATA[http://www.smartplanet.com/forum/discussions/1-5135-40777]]></link>
        <description><![CDATA[I can think of better cleaner, environmentally friendly ideas to spend the kind of money this will cost on. I'm affraid the under sea world of jacques costeaux would not approve. Become a NIMOT like me (Not In My Ocean Thanks).Non Merci mon amis!Regards Phillipechargehere ltd]]></description>
        <guid><![CDATA[http://www.smartplanet.com/forum/discussions/1-5135-40777]]></guid>
        <dc:creator><![CDATA[ev_fisheye]]></dc:creator>
        <pubDate>Mon, 25 Apr 2011 10:57:51 -0700</pubDate>
    </item>
             

    <item>
        <title><![CDATA[RE: France's latest green idea: underwater nuclear reactors]]></title>
        <link><![CDATA[http://www.smartplanet.com/forum/discussions/1-5135-38872]]></link>
        <description><![CDATA[GREEN IDEA!!!???  Next we'll be calling smog fresh air and acid rain, nature's paint remover.  In what insane world does it make more sense to screw up the ocean, which regulates the entire world's weather.  Witness the vast issues world-wide caused by el nino and la nina  episodes.  Droughts and floods in Southeast Asia and Auustralia, massive Typhoons in the Pacific, Katrina, this years winter of record snowfall in the Northeast US.  In addition, look at how ocean currents concentrate all the trash that is washed into it from all the surrounding shores into central locations in Pacific and Atlantic ocean which has patches of plastic bottles and other trash hundreds of square miles in extent.  Finally a thing which no one seems to recall any more is the heat pollution caused by these reactors.  The Calvert Cliffs reactor in Maryland had already altered the ecology (and the weather) of that area of the Chesapeake Bay watershed from the heat being discharged from its cooling water. (I am not referring to the radioactive coolant that contacts the fuel directly but the water that is used to cool off that coolant and to condense the steam used to run the turbines.)  At a time of global warming when the ice caps are melting and methane (an even worse greenhouse gas than C02), on the ocean floor is being released into the athmosphere because of the increase in ocean temperatures, does it make sense to pump even more heat into the ocean?!!In an era of truly stupid ideas, this has got to be one of the stupidest.  As Larry Niven is always having his characters say, &quot;You didn't think it through.&quot;]]></description>
        <guid><![CDATA[http://www.smartplanet.com/forum/discussions/1-5135-38872]]></guid>
        <dc:creator><![CDATA[joeller]]></dc:creator>
        <pubDate>Wed, 30 Mar 2011 06:29:24 -0700</pubDate>
    </item>
             

    <item>
        <title><![CDATA[A few flaws..]]></title>
        <link><![CDATA[http://www.smartplanet.com/forum/discussions/1-5135-34499]]></link>
        <description><![CDATA[If I were a terrorist I would see this as a very soft target for numerous and obvious reasons.  To call it a tempting target would be an understatement.As an eco nut I would be all over this as a disaster in the making.First it would alter the surrounding eco-system by raising the water temperature.  As an example, if this were put off the coast of Maine you would see a drop in the quantity and quality of the cold-water lobsters and cod caught in those waters.Then you have the potential of a radioactive leak getting caught in the ocean currents and dragged all over the Atlantic.  Think of Chernobyl happening under the sea.  In Russia much of the serious radioactive dust fell in a relatively confined footprint down wind.Using the Maine example again, you would be talking about the poisoning of ocean based food supplies from the east coast of the USA to Canada, Greenland, Iceland, England, Europe, Africa, etc?  I think you get the picture.Finally what do you do with the leftovers when it hits EOL?  Do you abandon it in place as stated by teched?  An undersea cleanup would be a challenge.]]></description>
        <guid><![CDATA[http://www.smartplanet.com/forum/discussions/1-5135-34499]]></guid>
        <dc:creator><![CDATA[Hates Idiots]]></dc:creator>
        <pubDate>Mon, 24 Jan 2011 12:33:44 -0800</pubDate>
    </item>
             

    <item>
        <title><![CDATA[RE: France's latest green idea: underwater nuclear reactors]]></title>
        <link><![CDATA[http://www.smartplanet.com/forum/discussions/1-5135-34482]]></link>
        <description><![CDATA[With the added benefit that when these Nuclear power plants reach their EOL, we just unplug from it and walk away...nobody will know that the plant is down there, slowly rusting away...and we won't need to dispose of the spent fuel!]]></description>
        <guid><![CDATA[http://www.smartplanet.com/forum/discussions/1-5135-34482]]></guid>
        <dc:creator><![CDATA[tech_ed@...]]></dc:creator>
        <pubDate>Sat, 22 Jan 2011 21:48:38 -0800</pubDate>
    </item>
             

    <item>
        <title><![CDATA[RE: France's latest green idea: underwater nuclear reactors]]></title>
        <link><![CDATA[http://www.smartplanet.com/forum/discussions/1-5135-34464]]></link>
        <description><![CDATA[I like the idea, but don't kid yourself about it being less vulnerable to earthquakes (many of which have epicenters off shore), though structurally, as long as it is not attached to the sea floor, it won't be cracked and/or torn apart like a land based structure. As for vulnerability relative to Tsunamis, it depends on how the Tsunami is generated, as well as other factors. When the big on occurred in 2005 in Southeast Asia, the cause was a fault line 600+ miles long, which shifted upwards approximately 23 feet. This generated a wave, which went all the way from the bottom of the ocean to the surface. Thus a similar causal factor would potentially impact this technology. There are also phenomenon known as Turbidity Current (think underwater land slide), which can wreak havoc on technology, as do freak currents associated with storm surges. As for a cataclysmic failure of the containment vessel, I would rather have it happen in the ocean than on land anytime. It would not be great if it happened, but the overall impact on life and property would be minimized compared to a similar breakdown on land.]]></description>
        <guid><![CDATA[http://www.smartplanet.com/forum/discussions/1-5135-34464]]></guid>
        <dc:creator><![CDATA[PSFTGURU@...]]></dc:creator>
        <pubDate>Fri, 21 Jan 2011 17:37:40 -0800</pubDate>
    </item>
             

    <item>
        <title><![CDATA[RE: France's latest green idea: underwater nuclear reactors]]></title>
        <link><![CDATA[http://www.smartplanet.com/forum/discussions/1-5135-34407]]></link>
        <description><![CDATA[Immediate questions:  Maintenance?  Access?By the way, 250 Megawatts of power (not energy).]]></description>
        <guid><![CDATA[http://www.smartplanet.com/forum/discussions/1-5135-34407]]></guid>
        <dc:creator><![CDATA[duaine@...]]></dc:creator>
        <pubDate>Fri, 21 Jan 2011 10:18:45 -0800</pubDate>
    </item>
             

    <item>
        <title><![CDATA[What about security?]]></title>
        <link><![CDATA[http://www.smartplanet.com/forum/discussions/1-5135-34435]]></link>
        <description><![CDATA[Just because it's inconvenient to physically access, doesn't mean it's impossible.  What if a terrorist attack or natural disaster occurs?  What is the environmental impact of radioactive material on sea water and its inhabitants?]]></description>
        <guid><![CDATA[http://www.smartplanet.com/forum/discussions/1-5135-34435]]></guid>
        <dc:creator><![CDATA[Bit-Smacker]]></dc:creator>
        <pubDate>Fri, 21 Jan 2011 09:37:54 -0800</pubDate>
    </item>
             

    <item>
        <title><![CDATA[RE: France's latest green idea: underwater nuclear reactors]]></title>
        <link><![CDATA[http://www.smartplanet.com/forum/discussions/1-5135-34431]]></link>
        <description><![CDATA[I have a business model that will make the cost of such tech, no cost to the buyer.Need a partner to help implement.  Or, any companies to contact me directly.Thomas Adairthomasadair@live.com]]></description>
        <guid><![CDATA[http://www.smartplanet.com/forum/discussions/1-5135-34431]]></guid>
        <dc:creator><![CDATA[riskfreeinvesting]]></dc:creator>
        <pubDate>Fri, 21 Jan 2011 09:18:21 -0800</pubDate>
    </item>
    </channel>
</rss>

