<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8" ?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:s="http://www.bnet.com/search" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"  xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
<channel>
    <title><![CDATA[Discussion on Rolling Stones' keyboardist gets his satisfaction on the farm ]]></title>
    <link><![CDATA[http://www.smartplanet.com/forum/discussions/1-2265]]></link>
    <atom:link rel="hub" type="application/rss+xml" href="http://pubsubhubbub.appspot.com/" />
    <atom:link rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" href="http://www.smartplanet.com/forum/discussions/1-2265/rss" />

    <description><![CDATA[]]></description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <lastBuildDate>2013-05-21T09:23:32-07:00</lastBuildDate>
             

    <item>
        <title><![CDATA[I'm OK With the Conservation Aspect, However ...]]></title>
        <link><![CDATA[http://www.smartplanet.com/forum/discussions/1-2265-14532]]></link>
        <description><![CDATA[I have some concern about the statements, &quot;We just have to manage the trees properly. They don?t manage themselves.&quot;Is it showing hubris, a mixed message, or exposing a lack of understanding?  To me, the operation is a timber haul so don't try to profess that the forest is wayward, a lost cause, or unsustainable w/o human involvement.  Otherwise, rock on.]]></description>
        <guid><![CDATA[http://www.smartplanet.com/forum/discussions/1-2265-14532]]></guid>
        <dc:creator><![CDATA[donnydo77@...]]></dc:creator>
        <pubDate>Fri, 30 Apr 2010 05:40:40 -0700</pubDate>
    </item>
    </channel>
</rss>

