<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8" ?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:s="http://www.bnet.com/search" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"  xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
<channel>
    <title><![CDATA[Discussion on The amazing race for the cheapest and fastest DNA machine ]]></title>
    <link><![CDATA[http://www.smartplanet.com/forum/discussions/1-1658]]></link>
    <atom:link rel="hub" type="application/rss+xml" href="http://pubsubhubbub.appspot.com/" />
    <atom:link rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" href="http://www.smartplanet.com/forum/discussions/1-1658/rss" />

    <description><![CDATA[]]></description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <lastBuildDate>2013-05-22T10:42:04-07:00</lastBuildDate>
             

    <item>
        <title><![CDATA[Sequencing Accuracy]]></title>
        <link><![CDATA[http://www.smartplanet.com/forum/discussions/1-1658-48602]]></link>
        <description><![CDATA[donnydo77, you areright on the money. Truly accurate, rapid and CHEAP, repeat CHEAP sequencing will lead to ever-larger databases of information for comparative and research purposes. I have a &quot;vision&quot; of what the ideal sequencer looks and acts like, what it's specifications are, and how it would be invaluable to the health care industry on behalf of patients.]]></description>
        <guid><![CDATA[http://www.smartplanet.com/forum/discussions/1-1658-48602]]></guid>
        <dc:creator><![CDATA[SocratesRedux]]></dc:creator>
        <pubDate>Thu, 28 Jul 2011 15:33:44 -0700</pubDate>
    </item>
             

    <item>
        <title><![CDATA[Sequencing Won't Be Accurate As People Would Dare or Be Led to Believe]]></title>
        <link><![CDATA[http://www.smartplanet.com/forum/discussions/1-1658-16494]]></link>
        <description><![CDATA[It's still a probablity process of filling in the blanks using possible arrangements but much information is ommitted and unkown since it is misunderstood or not yet investigated.  The liability requirements will be a hinderance toward having legitimacy for any insurance or medical applications.  I'd recommend a long-term study that includes genetic profiles of thousands of people that indicates the determination of phenotypes and other attributes along with disease risks.  Then determine the effectiveness of the suggested genotypic expression by comparing with what arises during their lives with the traits of their children, health, and aging.  I'm sure variability will be inherent so how will quality assurance be possible?  In that regard, don't consider anything for insurance or medical purposes.  The idyllic statement about using this being useful for general treatment is just that, another dubious utopian wish, especially since the standard of treatment in the USA is so variable anyway no matter if it is provided by a general practitioner or specialist.]]></description>
        <guid><![CDATA[http://www.smartplanet.com/forum/discussions/1-1658-16494]]></guid>
        <dc:creator><![CDATA[donnydo77@...]]></dc:creator>
        <pubDate>Sun, 06 Jun 2010 04:56:03 -0700</pubDate>
    </item>
             

    <item>
        <title><![CDATA[RE: The amazing race for the cheapest and fastest DNA machine]]></title>
        <link><![CDATA[http://www.smartplanet.com/forum/discussions/1-1658-11600]]></link>
        <description><![CDATA[I have no idea why all the fuss about the three. Can anyone elaborate? Intel has the chips and HD, Google has the search engine so does MSN and Yahoo. Sony is very well know for the best TV Trinitarian 3 gun HDTV or camera. All are meant for the work they are made. I do not mind Toshiba, Samsung the upcoming TV or cell phone, and that is a beauty, Sanyo, Panasonic or any more. I have no idea why we are fighting for the choice when now we can afford only one TV in the room, 1 cell in the hand or use only one, search from one source at one time. Now I see we have the notebook with the 3D and Polaroid spectacles. That is the too according Click on line BBC. has the problem.   Two newly launched 3D laptops - the Asus G51 J3D and the Acer Aspire 5738DG - are tested out by Marc Cieslak. Pictures are set to revolutionise online searches, with the results becoming more personal than ever. http://news.bbc.co.uk/2/hi/programmes/click_online/default.stm I thank you Firozali A.Mulla  DBA]]></description>
        <guid><![CDATA[http://www.smartplanet.com/forum/discussions/1-1658-11600]]></guid>
        <dc:creator><![CDATA[famulla]]></dc:creator>
        <pubDate>Sat, 20 Mar 2010 00:23:22 -0700</pubDate>
    </item>
             

    <item>
        <title><![CDATA[RE: The amazing race for the cheapest and fastest DNA machine]]></title>
        <link><![CDATA[http://www.smartplanet.com/forum/discussions/1-1658-11544]]></link>
        <description><![CDATA[Tandem, massively-parallel processing - definitely is changing the world, and will continue to do so. Good article. -- Jeff]]></description>
        <guid><![CDATA[http://www.smartplanet.com/forum/discussions/1-1658-11544]]></guid>
        <dc:creator><![CDATA[bitdoctor]]></dc:creator>
        <pubDate>Thu, 18 Mar 2010 12:06:19 -0700</pubDate>
    </item>
             

    <item>
        <title><![CDATA[RE: The amazing race for the cheapest and fastest DNA machine]]></title>
        <link><![CDATA[http://www.smartplanet.com/forum/discussions/1-1658-11030]]></link>
        <description><![CDATA[Nice roundup on the sequencing industry. If you look at the software companies that are aggressively pursuing the space, I think you will find the same dynamic. The industry is finding out what we are &quot;best at&quot;. As with the computer industry, as the equipments become more powerful and cheaper, the value added increasingly is enabled by the software.]]></description>
        <guid><![CDATA[http://www.smartplanet.com/forum/discussions/1-1658-11030]]></guid>
        <dc:creator><![CDATA[Ronald Ranauro]]></dc:creator>
        <pubDate>Fri, 12 Mar 2010 04:03:34 -0800</pubDate>
    </item>
    </channel>
</rss>

