Sequencing Won't Be Accurate As People Would Dare or Be Led to Believe
It's still a probablity process of filling in the blanks using possible arrangements but much information is ommitted and unkown since it is misunderstood or not yet investigated. The liability requirements will be a hinderance toward having legitimacy for any insurance or medical applications. I'd recommend a long-term study that includes genetic profiles of thousands of people that indicates the determination of phenotypes and other attributes along with disease risks. Then determine the effectiveness of the suggested genotypic expression by comparing with what arises during their lives with the traits of their children, health, and aging. I'm sure variability will be inherent so how will quality assurance be possible? In that regard, don't consider anything for insurance or medical purposes. The idyllic statement about using this being useful for general treatment is just that, another dubious utopian wish, especially since the standard of treatment in the USA is so variable anyway no matter if it is provided by a general practitioner or specialist.
