Discussion on:
Top
Rated
Rated
Stop Using Public Funds for Private Gain
Posted by quonexus
20th Feb
Just
In
In
AGENDA: Follow the Money to the TRUE COST
Posted by ViableWay
3rd Mar
Show:
+1
Vote
Stop Using Public Funds for Private Gain
Our governments, their social programs and middle class economy are drowning in the toilets of private gain. Obesity, diabetes, heart disease and cancer, and ultimately health care costs are the result of an insatiable corporate marketing, lobbying and profit-taking of toxic agribusiness and products like high fructose corn syrup. Politicians selected by billionaires like the Koch brothers and Michael Bloomberg are afraid to eliminate the private subsidies and tax loopholes of corporations and wealthy owners who keep them in office. States and local governments are going bankrupt, awash in unfunded mandates. Why would we fund start-ups with public funds to enrich the owner and the larger fish who gobbles them up? Governments and taxes should have a limited role - this is not it.
Posted by quonexus
20th Feb
0
Votes
Politicians selected by billionaires?
Fact: the vast majority of people in the U.S. are not billionaires.
Fact: the majority of people who selected Obama and the other members of congress, are not billionaires nor even wealthy.
Fact: most of the people who the democrats and Obama depend on, are not wealthy.
Fact: millions of the people who voted for Obama, don't pay any income taxes.
Those are the people who "select" the politicians who are making life miserable for the whole country. The billionaires and plain wealthy don't need government to keep them afloat. But, there are a good number of the wealthy and billionaires who will deflect from their agenda, by pretending to care about the people, like Buffet and Bloomberg and Gore and the two Clintons and many more.
Fact: the majority of people who selected Obama and the other members of congress, are not billionaires nor even wealthy.
Fact: most of the people who the democrats and Obama depend on, are not wealthy.
Fact: millions of the people who voted for Obama, don't pay any income taxes.
Those are the people who "select" the politicians who are making life miserable for the whole country. The billionaires and plain wealthy don't need government to keep them afloat. But, there are a good number of the wealthy and billionaires who will deflect from their agenda, by pretending to care about the people, like Buffet and Bloomberg and Gore and the two Clintons and many more.
Posted by adornoe
20th Feb
0
Votes
AGENDA: Follow the Money to the TRUE COST
While it helps stem the carnage of the GOP, many progressive politicians, celebrities and business moguls are not getting the story out to the people that will really help change the world. The TRUE COST of goods and services are hidden by SUBSIDIES (Pharmaceutical, Oil, Agriculture) and CORPORATE WELFARE (built into the tax code and exhorbitant profits of the Military Industrial Complex) that have the unintended consequences of making things that are harmful cheap, while things that we need (fruits veggies education health care) expensive.
We feed subsidized corn to cows and chickens so we have cheap hamburgers, and even though foreign labor and cheap oil for transporting South American vegetables keep the cost down some...a $1.00 hamburger costs more in long term health care, while a $1.00 tomato would reduce health care costs. Pharmaceutical companies pay more for marketing than for research and development of CURES (really they research for long term addictive DRUGS instead of solutions.) and most of the development costs for the drugs come from state supported universities.
In a properly MARKET DRIVEN ECONOMY, the banana pickers would receive a living wage, and the oil for transporting crops would not be subsidized by the feds. The cost of driving to and from work would ELIMINATE COMMUTING altogether and any job that could be done from home would be done from home. Meat consumption would be drastically reduced and the meat consumed would be GRASS FED and FREE RANGE while any subsidies for food would be for GREENS and FRUITS and FISH. No company could pay less than a LIVING WAGE, and all citizens would receive WELLNESS CARE and EDUCATION that included computer programming, civics, economics and ETHICS as the core curriculum. Solar/Renewable energy would make oil a product that was never burned, but rather used in manufacturing items to reuse and recycle. PATENT and COPYRIGHT mandatory licensing laws would encourage COLLABORATION to produce the BEST products, not the short term profitable ones.
I am sure I have missed a few, but I think you see the problem: We cannot make decisions about the future when we aren't given the FACTS/COSTS and CONSEQUENCES of our choices.
We feed subsidized corn to cows and chickens so we have cheap hamburgers, and even though foreign labor and cheap oil for transporting South American vegetables keep the cost down some...a $1.00 hamburger costs more in long term health care, while a $1.00 tomato would reduce health care costs. Pharmaceutical companies pay more for marketing than for research and development of CURES (really they research for long term addictive DRUGS instead of solutions.) and most of the development costs for the drugs come from state supported universities.
In a properly MARKET DRIVEN ECONOMY, the banana pickers would receive a living wage, and the oil for transporting crops would not be subsidized by the feds. The cost of driving to and from work would ELIMINATE COMMUTING altogether and any job that could be done from home would be done from home. Meat consumption would be drastically reduced and the meat consumed would be GRASS FED and FREE RANGE while any subsidies for food would be for GREENS and FRUITS and FISH. No company could pay less than a LIVING WAGE, and all citizens would receive WELLNESS CARE and EDUCATION that included computer programming, civics, economics and ETHICS as the core curriculum. Solar/Renewable energy would make oil a product that was never burned, but rather used in manufacturing items to reuse and recycle. PATENT and COPYRIGHT mandatory licensing laws would encourage COLLABORATION to produce the BEST products, not the short term profitable ones.
I am sure I have missed a few, but I think you see the problem: We cannot make decisions about the future when we aren't given the FACTS/COSTS and CONSEQUENCES of our choices.
Posted by ViableWay
3rd Mar