Read my posts again; this time with your reading comprehension brain cells
engaged.
My posts weren't comparing the relative advantages or disadvantages between EVs and SUVs.
My comments referred to the savings of money that people seek with their EVs or hybrids. I'm talking about how, no matter what you drive, you'll still end up paying more or the same as you do now, but, with the budgets of the country and states and communities not getting the amount of funding needed to run those governments, the taxes will be going up. Even if you were to get a vehicle which costs nothing when it comes to "fueling" it up, you will end up paying more, because the governments are running out of money, and they need to make up that loss of revenue somewhere, and that somewhere will iniclude the number of miles that people drive, no matter if it's in SUVs or EVs or hybrids.
My comments above referred to those who use EVs and hybrids, where those owners might be tempted to drive more, because their fuels costs will be a lot less than for SUVs. And, with the schemes which governments are drawing up, those who drive more, will pay more, so the EVs and hybrids might end up paying more than the SUV owners, because those SUV owners might decide to drive less, not just because they would consume more fuel, but because, governments might decide that, the bigger vehicles are more destructive to roads and therefore, need to pay more for "road repair and maintenance". But, the revenue collected for those repair and maintenance costs would get redirected towards funding of other government functions. It's like what happened with Social Security funding, which was supposed to be kept in separate accounts for payments to those in need after retiring, but, that funding ended up getting tossed into the general funds for use in all other areas of government functions.
Next time, try to understand what you read. I had to expand on my comments here, just for your edification.
