Re: No "real" science to refute
There is tons of science around climate change that is potentially refutable but since it's not been possible to refute it so far your side turns to political arguments. I'd be happy is we could all just agree on the science then we could argue about the implications and potential responses.
The part that worries me is someone may come up with something that will radically change the balance and interactions of the whole system and really muck the works up!
Like say increasing the level of CO2 in the atmosphere by 40% in 100 years? We're running a huge experiment by doing that right now with no guarantee we'll like the results.
