<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8" ?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:s="http://www.bnet.com/search" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"  xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
<channel>
    <title><![CDATA[Discussion on In China, transit disruption prompts calls to ban Wi-Fi ]]></title>
    <link><![CDATA[http://www.smartplanet.com/forum/discussions/1-12394]]></link>
    <atom:link rel="hub" type="application/rss+xml" href="http://pubsubhubbub.appspot.com/" />
    <atom:link rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" href="http://www.smartplanet.com/forum/discussions/1-12394/rss" />

    <description><![CDATA[]]></description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <lastBuildDate>2013-05-25T21:06:35-07:00</lastBuildDate>
             

    <item>
        <title><![CDATA[Sounds like another boondoggle...]]></title>
        <link><![CDATA[http://www.smartplanet.com/forum/discussions/1-12394-82787]]></link>
        <description><![CDATA[...due to Inferior technology or construction.  So instead we'll find a technological boogieman like 'wifi&quot; to blame it on.Each and every day, thousands of airliners with far more complex and dependent electronics fly flawlessly with millions of people using wifi enabled devices without a problem.  Seems odd that a relatively low-tech train cannot do the same.]]></description>
        <guid><![CDATA[http://www.smartplanet.com/forum/discussions/1-12394-82787]]></guid>
        <dc:creator><![CDATA[JohnMcGrew@...]]></dc:creator>
        <pubDate>Tue, 06 Nov 2012 15:41:01 -0800</pubDate>
    </item>
             

    <item>
        <title><![CDATA[Kudos]]></title>
        <link><![CDATA[http://www.smartplanet.com/forum/discussions/1-12394-82754]]></link>
        <description><![CDATA[for even getting wi-fi in a subway. So do the trains use the same frequencies or is it just poor design of the electronics (hint).]]></description>
        <guid><![CDATA[http://www.smartplanet.com/forum/discussions/1-12394-82754]]></guid>
        <dc:creator><![CDATA[opcom]]></dc:creator>
        <pubDate>Tue, 06 Nov 2012 09:46:28 -0800</pubDate>
    </item>
    </channel>
</rss>

