Fox was right. The moderator was wrong and biased.
Are you seriously insinuating that Obama was being truthful when he said that he called the Benghazi attacks an act of terrorism in his Rose Garden address the day after the attack?
Any reasonable person who heard his speech or read the transcript knows that that is simply not true. He did utter the words "act of terrorism" but that was not in regard to the Benghazi attack but rather just a general reference after mentioning 9/11, etc.
If he truly felt that the Benghazi attacks were acts of terror, then why did he and his administration claim for the next two weeks that the attack was a spontaneous protest in reaction to the anti-Islam youtube video?
If you want to support Obama that is fine, but can't you at least be honest and admit that he lied during the debate about claiming that he called the Benghazi attack an act of terror the day after it occurred and that Romney had it right? The moderator interjecting herself at that point was inappropriate and biased, and Fox taking exception to it is what real journalists are supposed to do. They are supposed to report facts and not their own opinions. Maybe you've forgotten that after watching too much MSNBC.
