Actually, I wouldn't necessarily be against that.
Conceptually, I'd be for it. Conceptually, 20 years ago I was for "cap and trade", except then it was for honest threats like particulate and other toxic emissions.
The problem is that carbon taxes as they are being proposed and implemented are a complete sham. The measuring metrics are bogus, the revenues are to be directed to be spent on boondoggles for the benefit of politicians and their corporate cronies. They don't prevent an ounce of carbon emissions, and in many cases actually encourage them.
Come up with an honest mechanism and we'll talk.