<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8" ?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:s="http://www.bnet.com/search" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"  xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
<channel>
    <title><![CDATA[Discussion on Online security with the rhythm of your heart ]]></title>
    <link><![CDATA[http://www.smartplanet.com/forum/discussions/1-12035]]></link>
    <atom:link rel="hub" type="application/rss+xml" href="http://pubsubhubbub.appspot.com/" />
    <atom:link rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" href="http://www.smartplanet.com/forum/discussions/1-12035/rss" />

    <description><![CDATA[]]></description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <lastBuildDate>2013-05-25T08:50:27-07:00</lastBuildDate>
             

    <item>
        <title><![CDATA[Horrible idea...]]></title>
        <link><![CDATA[http://www.smartplanet.com/forum/discussions/1-12035-80400]]></link>
        <description><![CDATA[As an emergency medical technician (EMT) one of the most common types of patients I  encounter is the cardiac emergency.  We are especially alert of patients with &quot;ST elevation&quot; in their EKG, which indicates a specific kind of heart attack.  I can only imagine that a new onset ST elevation wouldn't allow a user to access his or her phone if it were locked by EKG shape. I'm sure the courts would have a field day with a product liability case where somebody couldn't unlock their phone to call for help because the phone didn't recognize their heart beat shape.]]></description>
        <guid><![CDATA[http://www.smartplanet.com/forum/discussions/1-12035-80400]]></guid>
        <dc:creator><![CDATA[ssavett]]></dc:creator>
        <pubDate>Mon, 08 Oct 2012 20:50:54 -0700</pubDate>
    </item>
             

    <item>
        <title><![CDATA[Not convinced...]]></title>
        <link><![CDATA[http://www.smartplanet.com/forum/discussions/1-12035-80398]]></link>
        <description><![CDATA[What about arrhythmias? Ectopic beats? Pacemakers? There are a surprising number of people with cardiomyopathies... can they really be accommodated unfailingly by this idea?  Cardiologists routinely use drugs that will affect their patients' ECGs (sorry, I'm a Brit - I realise that the US abbreviation for electrocardiogram is EKG but I can't bring myself to use it). Maybe even something as common as beta-blockers would be enough to cause problems. Fingerprints and retinal scans would seem to be much more stable.]]></description>
        <guid><![CDATA[http://www.smartplanet.com/forum/discussions/1-12035-80398]]></guid>
        <dc:creator><![CDATA[Brian Luff]]></dc:creator>
        <pubDate>Mon, 08 Oct 2012 15:12:36 -0700</pubDate>
    </item>
    </channel>
</rss>

