Same Propaganda-New source.
If the French Study were the ONLY one that showed the problems it did, even I would be suspicious. Having read a few hundred Peer-Reviewed Papers and Studies that preceded it, but never made the MSM, tends to make me a believer. Besides, the Serallini Study used the same rats, similar procedures, but went a full two years, rather than the 90 days the FDA allowed Monsanto to do. (When Profits are waiting-why spend extra time-right?) So, if the Methodology is being denigrated by Monsanto, then it's a tacit admission if flaws in it's own. Bottom line, the world has seen what I have seen, we know the statistics emanating from the deployment of this technology, as we are paying for it with added taxes, health care costs, and with our own Government destroying small and family farms to make way for Industrial Mono-Cropping Operations. You like it-YOU eat it. America is tired of this pathetic Monsanto-Serving "Sturm Und Drang'!
