But...
...isn't "morning fog in the northeast tends to dissipate quickly when the wind is blowing in a particular direction" precisely the kind of data on which a computer excels??? I think you picked a pretty bad example to illustrate the point.
The only difference between a computer and a human brain considering variables to predict an outcome is that they've yet to make a machine with the same capacity and resolution as the human organ.
That the brain can consider, often intuitively, causes and effects beyond what the computer model considers is only a statement on the lack of complexity of the machine and/or its programming.
Give it time. At this point it's like expecting supersonic speeds from a Model T.
