Agree
There were some contradictory findings in the research. One that stood up was that those who used cannabis less frequently were more at risk of testicular cancer than those who used it daily.
There needs to be more studies on the effect of marijuana. I stopped believing the pro or con studies because there seems to be a bias flaw in those studies. An organization called MAPS is sueing the DEA to get access to marijuana for a stringent test but the DEA is the only source legally. The DEA can tilt a research by the quality of the marijuana or even provide adulterated marijuana.
I think it is important to describe the side effects as well as the benefits of medical marijuana in an unbiased and scientific way. The anti drug authorities act as if the danger of marijuana is obvious and don't spell out what those dangers are. The pro-pot group also push the beneficial side without addressing the dangers. The DEA is more interested in finding that marijuana is bad than to accept that there are benefits; this is probably to keep their department fully funded in the misguided war on drugs.
