Discussion on:
Top
Rated
Rated
bad Science
Posted by sarai1313@...
3rd Sep
Just
In
In
quite normal
Posted by aflemo
15th Sep
Show:
+4
Votes
bad Science
An addict is a addict no mater what the addiction is. An to say the Internet made them addict's is just as stupid as saying a drink or drug made some one a addict. It is part of are personality and dependent on influences in are lives whether or not we become addicted to what ever come into our lives,food,sex,and what ever we use drown are self with . Take it from me a addict even though I have been clean for 20 years I am still a addict. Peace every one .
Posted by sarai1313@...
3rd Sep
+3
Votes
Into the Gulag
Yes, commissar...the people are getting smarter and talking back using the Internet.
Surely, we can stop this.
Let us use DSM-IV and label it an "addiction"...then proper grounds for incarceration can proceed!
Ah, a toast then, some vodka no...we will have this "freedom addiction" under control in no time soon!
Surely, we can stop this.
Let us use DSM-IV and label it an "addiction"...then proper grounds for incarceration can proceed!
Ah, a toast then, some vodka no...we will have this "freedom addiction" under control in no time soon!
Posted by jabailo1
3rd Sep
+1
Vote
It's not a new concept.
Since the days when people used networks of text-menu-driven bulletin boards and dial up modems, certain people have complained about the time spent online by others. The stereotype of the geek in the basement with a bare light bulb and a terminal, excluding himself from normal human contact began in those days.
Before that, was it the ham radio guy with a clackety teletype machine, up all night sending 10 characters per second out into the ether where 100 other stations waited?
Now it is morphed into the "poor internet addict who needs society's help". I suggest that addictions are real, and that some people are more prone to them than others, but I reject the notion that anyone can be addicted to the internet any more than they could be addicted to the telephone, the post office, and the physical library.
It is great to research the causes of addictions, and it is interesting to know why some people spend more time "on the internet" than others, but those whom complain about what other people do with their spare time&money should mind their own business.
What is next? Is it OK to spend an hour researching real knowledge like how a magnetron works or why a tire may explode, but not to spend an hour on something trivial or fun like facebook or a video game? 2 hours? 5 hours??
Life would be even more fun if people would mind their own business, but there's never any money to be made by minding one's own business. There is money to be made by finding out what people like to do and putting a stop to it.
Such studies, perhaps paid for by the government, serve to open the door to more 'classification of behaviors' and from that, intrusions into people's private lives and ways to extract funds from them and from society through monitoring and exertion of increased control.
Before that, was it the ham radio guy with a clackety teletype machine, up all night sending 10 characters per second out into the ether where 100 other stations waited?
Now it is morphed into the "poor internet addict who needs society's help". I suggest that addictions are real, and that some people are more prone to them than others, but I reject the notion that anyone can be addicted to the internet any more than they could be addicted to the telephone, the post office, and the physical library.
It is great to research the causes of addictions, and it is interesting to know why some people spend more time "on the internet" than others, but those whom complain about what other people do with their spare time&money should mind their own business.
What is next? Is it OK to spend an hour researching real knowledge like how a magnetron works or why a tire may explode, but not to spend an hour on something trivial or fun like facebook or a video game? 2 hours? 5 hours??
Life would be even more fun if people would mind their own business, but there's never any money to be made by minding one's own business. There is money to be made by finding out what people like to do and putting a stop to it.
Such studies, perhaps paid for by the government, serve to open the door to more 'classification of behaviors' and from that, intrusions into people's private lives and ways to extract funds from them and from society through monitoring and exertion of increased control.
Posted by opcom
4th Sep
-1
Votes
Seems we have a few addicted trolls
Something is an addictions if it does not allow you to function. Retarded comments been the norm of trolls we are not talking about people using to much internet we are talking about people who can't get off the internet just like people who light up two cigarets at a time. Addictions like obsession is a bad thing as for how long people are online, how long does it take to troll a few sights a day, or do you trolls stay online all day trolling?
Posted by Kiljoy616
4th Sep
0
Votes
quite normal
I think this is quite normal. There are people who can not live without books and without the theater and it considered normal.
ryska kvinnor
ryska kvinnor
Posted by aflemo
15th Sep