Data please?
There is no basis for debate until one examines the clinical disease comparisons between circumcised and uncircumcised men and their partners. If the differences are truly significant, or not - you have the answer and there is still no basis for debate. Typical of the usual not-so-smart SP articles, no disease data comparisons or refs./links are given and we don't know the basis of author's health predictions and or either side of the "discussion." Another example of the loss of intelligent and responsible journalism.