<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8" ?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:s="http://www.bnet.com/search" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"  xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
<channel>
    <title><![CDATA[Discussion on How to print high-res images the size of a human hair ]]></title>
    <link><![CDATA[http://www.smartplanet.com/forum/discussions/1-11360]]></link>
    <atom:link rel="hub" type="application/rss+xml" href="http://pubsubhubbub.appspot.com/" />
    <atom:link rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" href="http://www.smartplanet.com/forum/discussions/1-11360/rss" />

    <description><![CDATA[]]></description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <lastBuildDate>2013-05-22T05:30:40-07:00</lastBuildDate>
             

    <item>
        <title><![CDATA[Note the proposed uses for this tech]]></title>
        <link><![CDATA[http://www.smartplanet.com/forum/discussions/1-11360-76294]]></link>
        <description><![CDATA[None of the potential uses listed would be visible to the naked eye, so don't think this will have any impact on what we can actually see unaided.  Might be a way to frustrate currency counterfeiting, though, although you'd need a special device to detect the watermark.]]></description>
        <guid><![CDATA[http://www.smartplanet.com/forum/discussions/1-11360-76294]]></guid>
        <dc:creator><![CDATA[Pixel_Dude]]></dc:creator>
        <pubDate>Tue, 14 Aug 2012 09:30:55 -0700</pubDate>
    </item>
             

    <item>
        <title><![CDATA[Average printer at 10,000 dpi?]]></title>
        <link><![CDATA[http://www.smartplanet.com/forum/discussions/1-11360-76287]]></link>
        <description><![CDATA[Cool printer.  But the usual resolutions I see are 600 dpi.  That is a long way from 10,000 and only a factor of 10 from the incredible 100,000.  I suspect a mis-print.]]></description>
        <guid><![CDATA[http://www.smartplanet.com/forum/discussions/1-11360-76287]]></guid>
        <dc:creator><![CDATA[spudman@...]]></dc:creator>
        <pubDate>Tue, 14 Aug 2012 06:30:55 -0700</pubDate>
    </item>
    </channel>
</rss>

