I've never said that man-released CO2 wouldn't have "an effect".
All I've argued that there are many elements at play here, and CO2 is not exclusively responsible for the nominal heating that has occurred.
As for solar being perfect for "peak loads", I dispute that. The grid requires nominal balance in order not to collapse. (as demonstrated multiple times in India last week) A single cloud passing overhead immediately changes output on a local level whereas it does not change consumption levels. Without a viable storage mechanism to moderate these imbalances, wide-spread panel deployment cannot work.
As for the confusion above, I suspect that i8thecat4 is under the impression that Hates Idiots and I are one-and-the-same, and are paid by the Koch brothers by the identity. He is unable to conceive that there might be more than 1 person intellectually operating outside of the consensus collective, or "cabal" as HI pointed out above.
