The author cited the NRC as a pro-nuclear entity. This is manifestly untrue. I provided reasons. For an example of a pro-nuclear entity, that eviscerates the preposterous nonsense of anti-nuclear zealots such as those the author thought worthwhile to cite, dwell on, and treat with much respect, read this:
http://canadianenergyissues.com/2012/08/02/game-changing-enrichment-technology-offends-fossil-supporters-at-bas/ Now THAT is an example of a pro-nuclear point-of-view.