Discussion on:

3
Comments

Join the conversation!

Follow via:
RSS
0 Votes
+ -
No surprise. The technology is junk.
Considering that all 4 large turbines installed in Massachusetts since 2008 are currently off line because of structural design and installation flaws.

None of them have been working for the last 14 months or longer. It will be at least another 6 before any are repaired and operational.

Your stimulus tax dollars hard at work.
Posted by Hates Idiots
30th Jul
+1 Vote
+ -
If we had "invested" in developing storage technology...
...instead of windmills, this might be a different story. Without solving the base load problem first, our brilliant leaders have put the cart before the ox. But the problem is that the storage tech issue is much more difficult and hard to understand that windmills which everyone understands, and make for great photo-ops for politicians who wish to look green. (Except at Nantucket, where they are unpopular because they spoil the views of the "rich" environmentalists)
Posted by JohnMcGrew@...
30th Jul
+2 Votes
+ -
The installation decline
may also be something to do with wind energy being absurdly expensive, unreliable and ugly to name just three of many deficiencies. The carbon free answer to energy generation could be encapsulated in one word: thorium, but we seem to be content to leave it to our competitors, mainly India and China while expending our resources on a pipe dream.
Posted by midnighteye
30th Jul
Join the conversation
Formatting +
BB Codes - Note: HTML is not supported in forums
  • [b] Bold [/b]
  • [i] Italic [/i]
  • [u] Underline [/u]
  • [s] Strikethrough [/s]
  • [q] "Quote" [/q]
  • [ol][*] 1. Ordered List [/ol]
  • [ul][*] · Unordered List [/ul]
  • [pre] Preformat [/pre]
  • [quote] "Blockquote" [/quote]

Join the SmartPlanet community and join the conversation! Signing up is fast and free. Don't wait -- we want to hear your opinion!