<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8" ?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:s="http://www.bnet.com/search" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"  xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
<channel>
    <title><![CDATA[Discussion on The MITx experiment: Is interaction key? ]]></title>
    <link><![CDATA[http://www.smartplanet.com/forum/discussions/1-11112]]></link>
    <atom:link rel="hub" type="application/rss+xml" href="http://pubsubhubbub.appspot.com/" />
    <atom:link rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" href="http://www.smartplanet.com/forum/discussions/1-11112/rss" />

    <description><![CDATA[]]></description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <lastBuildDate>2013-05-24T23:55:54-07:00</lastBuildDate>
             

    <item>
        <title><![CDATA[The Quality of the Material not per the examiner but the examinee]]></title>
        <link><![CDATA[http://www.smartplanet.com/forum/discussions/1-11112-74513]]></link>
        <description><![CDATA[7157 is a good number to start.  People learning how many (9000)  made it to the mid-term also helps because they had the knowledge to pass midterm.  Hopefully more would be motivated based on the passing of the first group.  Kudos to the 7157 but it would be great if some how the 9000 would be motivated for a come-back-continuing-edu theme.  I hope the 9000 could fill the survey to better understand the online education for example did the study material had enough examples, not just enough exercises to cover the course?]]></description>
        <guid><![CDATA[http://www.smartplanet.com/forum/discussions/1-11112-74513]]></guid>
        <dc:creator><![CDATA[kritik1]]></dc:creator>
        <pubDate>Mon, 16 Jul 2012 16:31:11 -0700</pubDate>
    </item>
    </channel>
</rss>

