"facts" are in dispute
No, you actually made an assertion without even bothering to back it up with a specific example. And the format in this discussion allows voting without comment, as well as voting and comment. I could see where YOU might believe that wealth transfer or welfare is a problem, and you might actually have at least one good example of that. But just blubbering on about welfare and expecting everyone to agree with you because you're "right" (pun intended) leaves you open to negative votes, as well as comments that suggest you're just plain superficial. And you may have had 5 positive votes and six negatives - you don't know who voted and didn't comment, whichever way.
