EXACTLY !!
Someone understands scale cost factors! An $20k automobile with 5 seats = $4k/seat. HSR (high speed rail) costs $60k/seat. A 747 jet costs $462k/seat. The 6 seat ET3 capsules (not a train) can be mass produced using 1/8th as much material as an automobile, and cost even less. HSR must be elevated for safety and air-blast issues. Elevated double track must withstand the mass of two 100 ton locomotives passing each other. Elevated double tube ET3 infrastructure must bear the weight of two 1200lb capsules for only a little over a ton of live-load. For this reason ET3 guideway requires 1/35th as much material to build as HSR infrastructure. Tubes are produced using automated equipment for much less labor cost per mile than all the "false work" needed to assemble and unassembled forms for making HSR.
I am continually amazed at all the "experts" who comment about the impossibility of ET3 on online blogs (notice that very few of them use their real names). If they would just read the et3 websites (dot com and dot net) and or look up the first patent (US 5,950,543) they would be able to make credible arguments. I am also amazed at the poorly researched "reporting", and the dozens of "reporters" who have never talked with me (including the BBC "reporter" referenced in this article. et3 (at symbol) et3 (dot) com
