<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8" ?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:s="http://www.bnet.com/search" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"  xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
<channel>
    <title><![CDATA[Discussion on Q&A: Eat that fish! When overfishing is also sustainable ]]></title>
    <link><![CDATA[http://www.smartplanet.com/forum/discussions/1-10631]]></link>
    <atom:link rel="hub" type="application/rss+xml" href="http://pubsubhubbub.appspot.com/" />
    <atom:link rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" href="http://www.smartplanet.com/forum/discussions/1-10631/rss" />

    <description><![CDATA[]]></description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <lastBuildDate>2013-05-25T17:08:45-07:00</lastBuildDate>
             

    <item>
        <title><![CDATA[It's more about definitions.]]></title>
        <link><![CDATA[http://www.smartplanet.com/forum/discussions/1-10631-72071]]></link>
        <description><![CDATA[The &quot;green&quot; crowd has so polluted the vocabulary with politics that words like &quot;sustainability&quot; don't mean anything beyond a politically correct implication.  It's impossible to have constructive conversations without finite definitions of terms.]]></description>
        <guid><![CDATA[http://www.smartplanet.com/forum/discussions/1-10631-72071]]></guid>
        <dc:creator><![CDATA[JohnMcGrew@...]]></dc:creator>
        <pubDate>Thu, 31 May 2012 08:50:09 -0700</pubDate>
    </item>
             

    <item>
        <title><![CDATA[Hilborn is a hero]]></title>
        <link><![CDATA[http://www.smartplanet.com/forum/discussions/1-10631-72050]]></link>
        <description><![CDATA[To the worst of the commercial fishing industry. Professor Hilborn is the one of the last of the apparent advocates for the Bureau of Commercial Fisheries whose only focus was maximum production of fish products at the least possible cost. His views are anti-ocean ecosystem, ignoring destruction of the very habitat dependant on which real conservation, protection and restoration of overfished species can take place. His disregard for bycatch with something of a sneer is reflective of his real concern for the ocean and the long term sustainability not of a single managed commercial species but of the system that makes possible the production of all of the parts of the system that makes the managed species possible.Don't be misled as Hilborn cruises the world demeaning competent ocean scientists and arguing for his antiquated concepts of &quot;fishery management&quot;  while rejecting rational contemporary ocean management.We understand change is difficult Professor, especially at UW. But you need to adapt, for the sake of the oceans and the  burgeoning population of humans worldwide. The solution to every problem is not more production.]]></description>
        <guid><![CDATA[http://www.smartplanet.com/forum/discussions/1-10631-72050]]></guid>
        <dc:creator><![CDATA[DCGadfly]]></dc:creator>
        <pubDate>Thu, 31 May 2012 08:07:58 -0700</pubDate>
    </item>
             

    <item>
        <title><![CDATA[What a crock!]]></title>
        <link><![CDATA[http://www.smartplanet.com/forum/discussions/1-10631-71957]]></link>
        <description><![CDATA[- When overfishing is also sustainable ???The very definition of overfishing is that you are not fishing a sustainable catch.What he is talking about are managed stocks.  That is all folks.Size and catch limits are the goal to ensuring a healthy food supply from the ocean. - When overfishing is also sustainable ???  Is probably the dumbest statement I have read on this site from an alleged expert.His statements about not boycotting, overfishing being good and raising corn being bad make him sound like he is a fishing industry lobbyist.]]></description>
        <guid><![CDATA[http://www.smartplanet.com/forum/discussions/1-10631-71957]]></guid>
        <dc:creator><![CDATA[Hates Idiots]]></dc:creator>
        <pubDate>Wed, 30 May 2012 08:24:23 -0700</pubDate>
    </item>
    </channel>
</rss>

