Discussion on:

10
Comments

Join the conversation!

Follow via:
RSS
0 Votes
+ -
I don't think so.
At 1.7mm resolution, this is more of hobbyist device, which is what most FDM / ALM printers are.

I want SLA printers to come down in price, or online services such as Ponoko and Shapeways to get cheaper.
Posted by gork platter
27th Apr 2012
+2 Votes
+ -
Sufficient for rapid prototyping
Almost a decade ago, I worked for a company that made, among other things, control panels. We were making a new all-plastic control panel. Rapid Prototyping machines (i.e. 3D printers) were still in their infancy and a prototype panel made by a company with one would cost us over $1000 and take about 4 hours to make. It would have a resolution of about 1.7mm. We got the prototype in, took some fine grade sand paper and a couple of fine-toothed files to it and installed our circuit boards. And that is how we discovered a fatal flaw in the over-all design. Just because they make buttons 5mm wide, does not mean you can place them side by side and expect an average human to use them. It seems obvious now, but the buttons didn't seem that small when we held them in our hands as single components.

A week later, we had a new set of circuit boards and a new prototype enclosure. And that allowed us to have a look at our new control panel and to try it out in the lab under more or less real conditions before we had a mold cast and went into production.

So 1.7mm resolution is just fine for prototyping certain projects. And I would remind people that before they were called "3D printers", they were called "Rapid Prototyping Machines". Keep that in mind. They produce prototypes, not finished goods (yet).
Posted by mheartwood
26th Oct
-4 Votes
+ -
Business Application
Sign up free for Business Applications on the cloud. Get started with
CRM, ERP, Accounting, Warehouse Management, Invoicing, Email, Order
Management and many other applications on demand. No investment in
hardware and software required.

Business Software,Business Application, CRM software,online CRM
Posted by Business Application
28th Apr 2012
-3 Votes
+ -
PLease Check
Please Check out this website! https://www.softwareonthecloud.com/
Posted by kmbappi
29th Apr 2012
+1 Vote
+ -
Stress and Strain
Building a viable 3D mechanical object is more than just simply filling the space occupied by the design. What about mechanical forces? I am hoping someone can clarify for me how an object created by incremental deposition can possibly incorporate the kind of long-range structure required to handle significant stress and strain.
Posted by lexchis
5th Nov
0 Votes
+ -
Not always a factor
You get different types of parts, ornamental parts obviously does not need to be strong, but for aircraft parts on the other hand strength is ctirical. You use the correct manuf method according to the type of part required.
Posted by Riaanh
7th Feb
0 Votes
+ -
Still expensive for home used
I like this 3D printing new technology but i think i have to wait when it's more cheaper and maybe when that time comes it will be almost obsolete model already.
Posted by minutemanmktg
1st Dec
0 Votes
+ -
My first inkjet printer
an HP DeskJet cost me about $400 in 1992 dollars, which works out to about $650 in 2013 dollars.

And all it did was print 300 DPI monochrome documents.
Posted by fairportfan
7th Feb
0 Votes
+ -
Biomimicry Shoes, Guns, and a Rather Nice Lamp
Fashion, gadgets, and home decor including door handles described a little weirdly and in lower-case as: "a machine's perception lever 1" made of steel and bronze built up layer by layer in a 3D printing process. They cost 435 Euros. They're pretty, although you'd have to buy the print-out chairs ("print-out time 10-15 days"), terrific Ikea-y lamps, and fruit bowl (29Euros) too, so everyone would, you know, know. All and more at http://i.materialise.com
Posted by ekirchner
27th Dec
0 Votes
+ -
Cheap 3D Printers Good for Prototyping Only?
Yes, while the concept is promising, desktop 3D printers can't make functional finished products. But I still plan to buy one someday because I believe it could still be useful, for example, to make functional diy parts. Using the 3D printer would just be my first step in the process. It would take the initial work which I have neither the time nor talent to do freehand, and furnish me with my first step in the process: producing the exact shape and dimensions which I can then physically transfer to a mold. The mold, in turn, will be the crucible from which my final, useable, part would be formed. Sure, this is a little
removed from the 'dream come true' being promised for desktop 3D printer technology. But hey, at the very least, it is one more potentially valuable tool in the workshop to select from.
Posted by diyer13
2nd Jan
Join the conversation
Formatting +
BB Codes - Note: HTML is not supported in forums
  • [b] Bold [/b]
  • [i] Italic [/i]
  • [u] Underline [/u]
  • [s] Strikethrough [/s]
  • [q] "Quote" [/q]
  • [ol][*] 1. Ordered List [/ol]
  • [ul][*] · Unordered List [/ul]
  • [pre] Preformat [/pre]
  • [quote] "Blockquote" [/quote]

Join the SmartPlanet community and join the conversation! Signing up is fast and free. Don't wait -- we want to hear your opinion!