U.S. Army to power bases with garbage

By Andrew Nusca | Oct 12, 2009 |

U.K. defense technology firm Qinetiq has been awarded a three-year, $2.4 million contract to supply the United States Army with a system that can generate electricity from garbage.

Called PyTEC, the system includes a pyrolysis tube capable of consuming up to 220 lbs. of waste — which includes food, medical and sanitary, paper, plastics, tin, oil and glass — each hour. The PyTEC system also reclaims up to 500 kW of the thermal energy from the waste per hour, some of which is used to sustain the system itself.

The “containerized” system produces five times more energy than is used to power the system.

The system works by heating mixed waste to high temperature in the pyrolisis tube. Doing so releases combustible gases, which are stored and, later, burned to generate electricity.

This type of process differs from other systems because the heating takes place without oxygen, allowing it to handle untreated mixed waste.

In contrast, aerobic systems generally need waste to be a single type and diced before incineration. To boot, aerobic systems have trouble handling certain waste, such as tin and glass.

Aside from energy, the byproduct of the PyTEC system is a glassy waste product that is 5 percent of the volume of the original garbage.

The U.S. Army will commission and test the system next spring through early 2012. Up to ten systems are expected to be deployed, many of them in Iraq and Afghanistan, in an attempt to stem the army’s use of fossil fuels and augment waste disposal efforts.

 
Reply to Story

SmartPlanet TalkbackShare your ideas and expertise on this topic

Subscribe to this discussion via RSS

  •  
    1

    GuntherGump

    10/20/09 | Report as spam

    UK, why not a US solution?

    Why would we award something like this to the Brits?! Why not Startech Environmental Corporation (Founder CEO is an old Army guy!)

    Visit http://www.startech.net/

  •  
    2

    peter.lilburn@...

    10/20/09 | Report as spam

    RE: U.S. Army to power bases with garbage

    is it just me - or is this the ultimate SISO model.....

    Regs Pete

  •  
    3

    dkforpb@...

    10/21/09 | Report as spam

    RE: U.S. Army to power bases with garbage

    reply to GuntherGump: Information provided is sketchy, but the two systems appear to be similar ideas. It could be that Startech simply did not make a presentation of their product to the Army.

  •  
    4

    Professor8

    10/21/09 | Report as spam

    RE: U.S. Army to power bases with garbage

    History Channel had something about using a plasma to do much the
    same thing. The plasma rips apart the molecules so that even hazardous
    medical waste is rendered non-toxic. The heat drives a generator, and
    produces gas used to feed the plasma. Once it's initiated, it has a high net
    useful energy and materials yield.

  •  
    5

    337

    10/25/09 | Report as spam

    RE: U.S. Army to power bases with garbage

    Goodwork the syngas or producer gas and all the other variants also tie to the coal gas techniques used prior to exploration of natural gas reserves.

    Very interesting stuff and with any luck we can hope to see more of these adding to the worlds baseload grid power needs.

    Sure it might not be a major contributor towards baseload in big cities but every little bit helps
    even if it's just for peak load balancing.

    Great to see everyone doing they're bit.

    Regards.

  •  
    6

    337

    10/25/09 | Report as spam

    RE: U.S. Army to power bases with garbage

    Sorry to double post just an after thought.

    Paging all investors !

    As Peter said it could be the ultimate.

    I was just thinking of the global implications
    even if the big cities run out of waste to burn hmmm fancy that what a moral dilema happy

    Gee that would be flip side of the coin.

    Anyway even in countries plagued
    with our waste aswell as they're own well they could power the towns and have major processing
    plants in well situated locations eg enviromental impact minimisation to the hilt jst to be sure.

    One wonders how this thing goes with E waste?

    Sounds like most of it would turn to gases or carbon origins.

    High temperature burning is nothing new by any means and this technique is no doubt far more efficient than a lot of prior projects.

    The cost to build and so on being the crucial part.

    Any govt can look at this and go yep thats money well spent as they spend more than that at conferences just for lunch money :P

    The generators used would also be very efficient
    no doubt cogen units ?

    Very nice indeed that way even third world countries get to work with absolutely top class
    equipment win win.

    With any luck could this mean an end to illegal dumping ?

    Heres wishing.

    When dumps start runnning out of the stuff
    like some do now that are actually being mined for they're contents will dumps be paying you for your waste?

    lol now that will be the day !

    Bring it on !

    Better to burn it on the spot than have it
    in/on the ground even with liners waiting painfully extracting the methane most of which
    has seeped through the ground also not ideal.

    This puts a lemon in the mouths of all those who said nahhh sorry it's just not viable.

    Ba humbug they said !

    Paging Mr Rudd

    Paging Mr Rudd i have discovered some much needed infrastructure worthy of budgeting for in our nation building efforts.

    Transmission ends.

The following tags are supported in Smartplanet comments:
<b></b> <i></i> <u></u> <pre></pre>

Leave a Reply

  1. Name: You are currently: a Guest |
advertisement

Quick Poll

advertisement

Larry Dignan

Larry Dignan is Editor in Chief of ZDNet and SmartPlanet as well as Editorial Director of ZDNet's sister site TechRepublic. He was most recently Executive Editor of News and Blogs at ZDNet. Prior to that he was executive news editor at eWeek and news editor at Baseline. He also served as the East Coast news editor and finance editor at CNET News.com. Larry has covered the technology and financial services industry since 1995, publishing articles in WallStreetWeek.com, Inter@ctive Week, The New York Times, and Financial Planning magazine. He's a graduate of the Columbia School of Journalism and the University of Delaware.

For daily updates, follow Larry on Twitter.

Larry Dignan

Larry Dignan has nothing to disclose. He doesn't hold investments in the technology companies he covers.

Andrew Nusca

Andrew J. Nusca is an associate editor for ZDNet and SmartPlanet. As a journalist based in New York City, he has written for Popular Mechanics and Men's Vogue and his byline has appeared in New York magazine, The Huffington Post, New York Daily News, Editor & Publisher, New York Press and many others. He also writes The Editorialiste, a media criticism blog.

He is a New York University graduate and former news editor and columnist of the Washington Square News. He is a graduate of the Columbia University Graduate School of Journalism. He has been named "Howard Kurtz, Jr." by film critic John Lichman despite having no relation to him. A native of Philadelphia, he lives in New York with his fiancée and his cat, Spats.

Follow him on Twitter

Andrew Nusca

Andrew J. Nusca does not hold any investments in the technology companies he covers.
Smart Takes is a regular digest of the day's news headlines viewed through a SmartPlanet lens, offering an editor's take on breaking stories and opinion from around the Web and highlighting information that will make you smarter.