Unstable element 114 reproduced; dashes hopes of atomic stability

By Andrew Nusca | Sep 30, 2009 |

Scientists at Lawrence Berkley National Laboratory last week confirmed that they were able to produce element 114, but the super-heavy sample quickly decayed, dashing hopes that it would be stable.

Russian scientists first claimed to create atoms of the element informally referred to as “ununquadium” 10 years ago. Since then, scientists hoped that the element, number 114 on the periodic table, was an “island of stability” where it could exist in large quantities for a long period of time.

That turned out not to be true, sending scientists back to the drawing board.

Scientists make super-heavy elements one atom at at time by smashing together the nuclei of lighter elements, fusing them together to form the heavier nucleus of the larger element.

But most super-heavy elements are unstable, and only exist for fractions of a second before rapidly decaying back into lighter material.

Nuclear physicists believe that the instability plateaus at a particular number, with the number of protons and neutrons able to produce enough binding energy to counteract the forces that tear apart the heavy nuclei.

Called an “island of stability”, the stable elements are usually surrounded by unstable elements that dissipate in nanoseconds.

There aren’t any practical uses for super-heavy elements at the end of the periodic table, but it’s a frontier still to be explored.

As for that island of stability: the hope now rests on elements 120 and 126.

[via; via]

 
Reply to Story

SmartPlanet TalkbackShare your ideas and expertise on this topic

Subscribe to this discussion via RSS

  •  
    1

    Dr_Zinj

    10/01/09 | Report as spam

    Not enough material to come up with practical uses

    New discoveries rarely yeild anything of practical value until a long time after they've been around.

    Give a significant amount to as many people as possible to play with and you'll eventually see uses for it.

  •  
    2

    JohnMcGrew@...

    10/01/09 | Report as spam

    It's a "black swan"

    You don't know what you don't know. Since everyone seems to consider
    such elements impossibly unstable and therefore useless, few have seen
    reason to consider the useful possibilities for such elements. But
    since we obviously don't fully understand where the "instability
    plateau" is and all the factors that render such elements stable or
    unstable, do we really know that there are not other possibilities?

    Perhaps there will be a day when such elements are better understood,
    can be tested, and then possible uses can be contemplated. After all,
    how many "useless" aspects of science 100 years ago are now
    indispensable aspects of every day life?

  •  
    3

    rjmuench@...

    10/01/09 | Report as spam

    RE: Unstable element 114 reproduced; dashes hopes of atomic stability

    Note: the theory is that there are "magic numbers" for protons and neutrons, which then have special stability like the electron configurations of noble gases. The theory predicted that 114 protons should be stable and apparently it is not.

    In the field of science fiction, element 114 was said to power anti-gravity UFO's.

  •  
    4

    rflulling@...

    10/01/09 | Report as spam

    any one care for an electron?

    Unless I am mistaken, these heavy atoms are not at all properly
    balanced. From what little I have read they do take and build heavy
    particles one Proton or Neutron at a time. But for reasons I don't
    understand they never mention the rest of the parts. So from my
    perspective an atom comprised only of Neutrons or visa versa is
    hardly an island of stability if more than half the island is
    unaccounted for.

    The way I see it, every one likes to try to create particles from a few
    nano seconds after the big bang. We seem to agree that those
    particles quickly became other things. What makes us think any
    different now? Infact modern elements are very well behaved
    because they consist of multiple subatomic structures whose own
    unique properties balance and compliment each other.

  •  
    5

    Ed999

    10/02/09 | Report as spam

    RE: Unstable element 114 reproduced; dashes hopes of atomic stability

    According to theory, the instability is a logical consequence of the nature of the strong nuclear force: that force (or "glue") which ordinarily binds the nucleus of an atom together. It is so localised a force that it barely extends across the diameter of the nucleus. When the nucleus exceeds a certain size, the strong nuclear force can no longer hold the protons and neutrons together, so the element is unstable. Element 114 is a case in point; and the more neutrons you add, to try to bind the protons together, the bigger a nucleus you create: you're just reinforcing the problem. So there is no logic in the suggestion that any element comprising more than 114 protons can be stable either.

    Ed

The following tags are supported in Smartplanet comments:
<b></b> <i></i> <u></u> <pre></pre>

Leave a Reply

  1. Name: You are currently: a Guest |
advertisement

Quick Poll

advertisement
Click Here
advertisement
Click Here
advertisement

Larry Dignan

Larry Dignan is Editor in Chief of ZDNet and SmartPlanet as well as Editorial Director of ZDNet's sister site TechRepublic. He was most recently Executive Editor of News and Blogs at ZDNet. Prior to that he was executive news editor at eWeek and news editor at Baseline. He also served as the East Coast news editor and finance editor at CNET News.com. Larry has covered the technology and financial services industry since 1995, publishing articles in WallStreetWeek.com, Inter@ctive Week, The New York Times, and Financial Planning magazine. He's a graduate of the Columbia School of Journalism and the University of Delaware.

For daily updates, follow Larry on Twitter.

Larry Dignan

Larry Dignan has nothing to disclose. He doesn't hold investments in the technology companies he covers.

Andrew Nusca

Andrew J. Nusca is an associate editor for ZDNet and SmartPlanet. As a journalist based in New York City, he has written for Popular Mechanics and Men's Vogue and his byline has appeared in New York magazine, The Huffington Post, New York Daily News, Editor & Publisher, New York Press and many others. He also writes The Editorialiste, a media criticism blog.

He is a New York University graduate and former news editor and columnist of the Washington Square News. He is a graduate of the Columbia University Graduate School of Journalism. He has been named "Howard Kurtz, Jr." by film critic John Lichman despite having no relation to him. A native of Philadelphia, he lives in New York with his fiancée and his cat, Spats.

Follow him on Twitter

Andrew Nusca

Andrew J. Nusca does not hold any investments in the technology companies he covers.
Smart Takes is a regular digest of the day's news headlines viewed through a SmartPlanet lens, offering an editor's take on breaking stories and opinion from around the Web and highlighting information that will make you smarter.