Toyota recall taints reliability reputation; highlights reliance on suppliers

By Andrew Nusca | Jan 29, 2010 |

Toyota said on Friday that it has remedied the problem behind its recall of 2.3 million vehicles in the United States, but the hit to the company’s legendary reputation for reliability remains so because of its reliance on a vast network of suppliers.

Cars are complex machines with thousands upon thousands of parts that can be made by outside manufacturers. Toyota’s suspension and recall of eight models due to a sticking accelerator problem — linked to a “disproportionately high number of deaths,” according to Democratic representative Bart Stupak — shows that it has lost quality control over its partners.

The problem is technically the fault of U.S. firm CTS Corp., which made the accelerator pedals in question. CTS says it manufactured the pedals based on Toyota’s design specifications, but Ford recently halted production of a Chinese model that uses CTS-made pedals.

Nevertheless, the cars have Toyota’s name on them, and drivers hold the company responsible.

Toyota is long-known for owning many of its Japanese suppliers outright, keeping the entire operation much more tight-knit than its rivals. It’s renowned for practicing the “just in time” inventory strategy that minimizes inventory and carrying costs.

But after aggressive expansion overseas in the last decade, the question is whether Toyota has rushed into relationships too quickly with parts makers for which it can’t vouch.

Toyota maintains that it inspects every part before it’s installed in a vehicle. The question is whether the parts were defective before installation or because of it.

Worse, the company is under fire for cutting costs too aggressively across the supply chain, despite complaints of runaway vehicles. Cost-cutting has been even more prevalent in the wake of the recent global economic downturn.

Now the company’s on the defensive, batting back criticism that it pursued the bottom line at the expense of its management strategy.

The backlash could ripple through the dozens of other industrial companies Toyota owns, including a steel manufacturer, precision equipment maker and auto parts maker Denso Corp.

Related coverage on SmartPlanet:

 
Reply to Story

SmartPlanet TalkbackShare your ideas and expertise on this topic

Subscribe to this discussion via RSS

  •  
    1

    JLHenry

    01/29/10 | Report as spam

    Another view . . .

    Let me ask you this: If this had happened to GM or Chrysler, would they have halted production and sales of the models in question? If you look back in history, the answer is no. As evidence, I offer up the Chevy Citation, quite possibly the most recalled car in history.

    GM and Chrysler would have continued to produce and sell said models, all the while telling people that They were working on the problem . . .

    Toyota took some responsibility, stopped Production AND sales of the models in question until they could get a handle on the problem.
    And like you said, they are taking a hit for being open and honest.


    THAT deserves some respect.

  •  
    2

    BigGusFromTheCoast.

    01/29/10 | Report as spam

    RE: Toyota recall taints reliability reputation; highlights reliance on suppliers

    Even with this flaw, Toyota still makes better cars and trucks than their American counterparts. GM, Ford, and Chrysler just don't get it anymore.

  •  
    3

    shenvalley1

    01/29/10 | Report as spam

    RE: Toyota recall taints reliability reputation; highlights reliance on suppliers

    "It's renowned for" should be "Its renowned for".

  •  
    4

    publicus

    01/29/10 | Report as spam

    RE: Toyota recall taints reliability reputation; highlights reliance on suppliers

    According to the NPR Marketplace report, CTS claims it produced the pedal sets exactly to Toyota's specifications.
    In support of that, CTS is producing the replacements for Toyota - something I wouldn't expect if they were genuinely responsible for the problem.

  •  
    5

    tikigawd

    01/29/10 | Report as spam

    @shenvalley1: you fail

    "It's renowned for" should be "Its renowned for".

    Um... no. The article is correct. It is as it should be: "it's renowned for." "It's" is a contraction of "it is..."

  •  
    6

    BigGusFromTheCoast.

    01/30/10 | Report as spam

    RE: Toyota recall taints reliability reputation; highlights reliance on suppliers

    @tikigawd: A+

  •  
    7

    pete_evangelist@...

    02/01/10 | Report as spam

    RE: Toyota recall taints reliability reputation; highlights reliance on suppliers

    Another good example of the "Bottom Line" before people.

  •  
    8

    martin999t

    02/01/10 | Report as spam

    RE: Toyota recall taints reliability reputation; highlights reliance on suppliers

    The problem is also occuring with European versiona of the cars that are not supplied by CTS. Design issue....

  •  
    9

    partman1969@...

    02/01/10 | Report as spam

    RE: Toyota recall taints reliability reputation; highlights reliance on suppliers

    Whether it halts production of a vehicle or not should not be the question. The question should be when are OEMs going to realize that outsourced parts especially those of Chinese and other third world manufacturers are the cause for most if not all of their failures. If most of the domestic U.S. made vehicles removed Chinese and Mexican produced bearings and brake parts (and chassis) in favor of U.S. made pieces their quality and resale would be vastly improved.

  •  
    10

    partman1969@...

    02/01/10 | Report as spam

    RE: Toyota recall taints reliability reputation; highlights reliance on suppliers

    Another reason the "World Economy" idea and world bank idea totally sucks !!!

  •  
    11

    elderlybloke

    02/01/10 | Report as spam

    RE: Toyota recall taints reliability reputation; highlights reliance on suppliers

    Some years ago , down here in New Zealand, Toyota cars came off the production line with faulty paint.

    The Paint peeled of the metal soon after delivery .

    Toyota promptly got the faulty vehicles back and did a repaint for the owners, and people here were impressed by the way they speedily overcame the problem.

    It enhanced their reputation, and Toyota is a trusted brand.

    ps. I drive a Holden Commodore (GM)

  •  
    12

    ajb2@...

    02/21/10 | Report as spam

    Kudos to Toyota

    Both for owning the problem and stopping lines to get it fixed. NO other manufacturer would have done both things.

    Mitsubishi was almost destroyed when coverups of serious safety issues came to light a few years ago. Toyota know full well that transparency is the only way they can maintain consumer confidence.

    It would seem some drivers (even Highway Troopers) would rather make panicked phone calls for help than try the obvious steps of taking a car with a jammed throttle out of gear or switching the engine off.

    SUA isn't a new phenomenon. An old British Austin design was particularly prone to it on high mileage vehicles when a worn carberettor linkage would snap. What has changed seems to be that drivers aren't trained to cope with it.

The following tags are supported in Smartplanet comments:
<b></b> <i></i> <u></u> <pre></pre>

Leave a Reply

  1. Name: You are currently: a Guest |
advertisement

Quick Poll

advertisement

Larry Dignan

Larry Dignan is Editor in Chief of ZDNet and SmartPlanet as well as Editorial Director of ZDNet's sister site TechRepublic. He was most recently Executive Editor of News and Blogs at ZDNet. Prior to that he was executive news editor at eWeek and news editor at Baseline. He also served as the East Coast news editor and finance editor at CNET News.com. Larry has covered the technology and financial services industry since 1995, publishing articles in WallStreetWeek.com, Inter@ctive Week, The New York Times, and Financial Planning magazine. He's a graduate of the Columbia School of Journalism and the University of Delaware.

For daily updates, follow Larry on Twitter.

Larry Dignan

Larry Dignan has nothing to disclose. He doesn't hold investments in the technology companies he covers.

Andrew Nusca

Andrew J. Nusca is an associate editor for ZDNet and SmartPlanet. As a journalist based in New York City, he has written for Popular Mechanics and Men's Vogue and his byline has appeared in New York magazine, The Huffington Post, New York Daily News, Editor & Publisher, New York Press and many others. He also writes The Editorialiste, a media criticism blog.

He is a New York University graduate and former news editor and columnist of the Washington Square News. He is a graduate of the Columbia University Graduate School of Journalism. He has been named "Howard Kurtz, Jr." by film critic John Lichman despite having no relation to him. A native of Philadelphia, he lives in New York with his fiancée and his cat, Spats.

Follow him on Twitter

Andrew Nusca

Andrew J. Nusca does not hold any investments in the technology companies he covers.
Smart Takes is a regular digest of the day's news headlines viewed through a SmartPlanet lens, offering an editor's take on breaking stories and opinion from around the Web and highlighting information that will make you smarter.