Large Hadron Collider breaks speed record; now world’s ‘highest energy particle accelerator’

By Andrew Nusca | Nov 30, 2009 |

CERN’s Large Hadron Collider on Monday became the world’s highest energy particle accelerator, accelerating its twin beams of protons to an energy of 1.18 TeV, or more than a trillion electron volts, in the early hours of the morning.

That breaks the previous world record of 0.98 TeV, held since 2001 by the U.S. Fermi National Accelerator Laboratory’s Tevatron collider.

The record is important because the LHC’s operators expect to use the machine soon to perform physics by 2010 — now just a month away.

The LHC was restarted just 10 days ago. The first beams were injected into the LHC on Friday, Nov. 20 and two beams circulated together for the first time on Monday, Nov. 23.

Moving forward, the team plans to increase the beam intensity before “delivering good quantities of collision data to the experiments before Christmas.” Only a low intensity pilot beam has been used thus far, and higher intensity is needed to provide useful proton-proton collision rates. After the weeklong phase, the LHC is expected to collide beams for calibration purposes until the end of the year.

“It is fantastic,” said CERN Director General Rolf Heuer in a statement. “However, we are continuing to take it step by step, and there is still a lot to do before we start physics in 2010. I’m keeping my champagne on ice until then.”

The purpose of the LHC is to address fundamental aspects of physics to understand the most basic of natural laws. The LHC sits in a tunnel approximately 17 miles in circumference, almost 600 feet in the ground beneath the Franco-Swiss border near Geneva, Switzerland.

Interested in keeping up with the LHC’s progress? Follow CERN on Twitter.

 
Reply to Story

SmartPlanet TalkbackShare your ideas and expertise on this topic

Subscribe to this discussion via RSS

  •  
    1

    markflax

    12/01/09 | Report as spam

    Question about travelling at the speed of light

    As I understand it the LHC will be, (is), accelerating two beams of protons towards each other at close to the speed of light. I know that, theoretically, matter cannot travel at the speed of light, but to an outside observer, when those two beams meet each other, would they be closing together at, or above, the speed of light?

    Just wondered.

    Mark

  •  
    2

    markflax

    12/01/09 | Report as spam

    RE: Large Hadron Collider breaks speed record; now world's 'highest energy particle accelerator'

    Just thought I would clarify my question above. The two beams are both travelling close to the speed of light, therefore in theory, so, when they travel towards each other, what is there relative speed towards each other?

  •  
    3

    fnoy@...

    12/01/09 | Report as spam

    RE: Large Hadron Collider breaks speed record; now world's 'highest energy particle accelerator'

    The two beams are going too fast for you to be able to "see" anything.

  •  
    4

    aeriform

    12/01/09 | Report as spam

    RE: Large Hadron Collider breaks speed record; now world's 'highest energy particle accelerator'

    Assuming they hit each other head on and are going at 99.99% the speed of light, the relative speed towards each other would be the speed of light times (0.9999+0.9999)/(1+0.9999*0.9999), or about 99.9999995% the speed of light (299792456.5m/s compared to c=299792458m/s).

    c*0.9999% is mentioned by:
    http://spectrum.ieee.org/aerospace/astrophysics/cern-to-start-up-the-large-hadron-collider-now-heres-how-it-plans-to-stop-it/1

  •  
    5

    aeriform

    12/01/09 | Report as spam

    RE: Large Hadron Collider breaks speed record; now world's 'highest energy particle accelerator'

    Should have read "c*99.99% is mentioned by:"

  •  
    6

    rpolunsky@...

    12/02/09 | Report as spam

    RE: Large Hadron Collider breaks speed record; now world's 'highest energy particle accelerator'

    Just for clarity, "closing speed" is an unreal number not limited by the speed of light. An observer at the head of one beam would probably perceive the speed computed by aeriform, but it's perfectly valid (and meaningless) to state that the beams are approaching with a closing speed of <2c. Since the space between the two beams is not itself moving, "closing speed" is only a convenient fiction. What the physicists are interested in is the momentum at impact.

  •  
    7

    markflax

    12/03/09 | Report as spam

    Thanks for all the replies

    Not sure I still understand, happy

    I guess this is a Relativity problem, and perhaps one where the observer needs to be defined.

    Mark

The following tags are supported in Smartplanet comments:
<b></b> <i></i> <u></u> <pre></pre>

Leave a Reply

  1. Name: You are currently: a Guest |
advertisement

Quick Poll

advertisement
Click Here
advertisement
Click Here
advertisement

Larry Dignan

Larry Dignan is Editor in Chief of ZDNet and SmartPlanet as well as Editorial Director of ZDNet's sister site TechRepublic. He was most recently Executive Editor of News and Blogs at ZDNet. Prior to that he was executive news editor at eWeek and news editor at Baseline. He also served as the East Coast news editor and finance editor at CNET News.com. Larry has covered the technology and financial services industry since 1995, publishing articles in WallStreetWeek.com, Inter@ctive Week, The New York Times, and Financial Planning magazine. He's a graduate of the Columbia School of Journalism and the University of Delaware.

For daily updates, follow Larry on Twitter.

Larry Dignan

Larry Dignan has nothing to disclose. He doesn't hold investments in the technology companies he covers.

Andrew Nusca

Andrew J. Nusca is an associate editor for ZDNet and SmartPlanet. As a journalist based in New York City, he has written for Popular Mechanics and Men's Vogue and his byline has appeared in New York magazine, The Huffington Post, New York Daily News, Editor & Publisher, New York Press and many others. He also writes The Editorialiste, a media criticism blog.

He is a New York University graduate and former news editor and columnist of the Washington Square News. He is a graduate of the Columbia University Graduate School of Journalism. He has been named "Howard Kurtz, Jr." by film critic John Lichman despite having no relation to him. A native of Philadelphia, he lives in New York with his fiancée and his cat, Spats.

Follow him on Twitter

Andrew Nusca

Andrew J. Nusca does not hold any investments in the technology companies he covers.
Smart Takes is a regular digest of the day's news headlines viewed through a SmartPlanet lens, offering an editor's take on breaking stories and opinion from around the Web and highlighting information that will make you smarter.