Recession will make today’s youngsters risk-averse… but don’t tell them that

By Joe McKendrick | Jan 11, 2010 |

In a analysis in the latest issue of Newsweek, Rana Foroohar speculates that the recent economic tsunami will result in the up-and-coming generation of young people being more risk-averse, much akin to the generation that came of age during the Great Depression of the 1930s:

Why? Because we are entering an era of diminished expectations and fewer choices, Foroohar claims, backing up the assertion with some research data:

“Unemployment and the specter of instability it creates will really shape the behavior of Generation Recession. A weaker dollar will make all Americans feel poorer by raising the cost of goods, but the young generation graduating and going to work now may actually end up poorer in real terms. Unemployment among 20- to 24-year-olds in the U.S. is more than 15 percent, compared with the nationwide average of 10 percent, and statistics show that for every percentage point in higher unemployment, new graduates take a 6 percent pay cut—an effect that lasts for decades. Skills loss could be a huge issue, too, especially because the average duration of unemployment has increased. Although wages in the U.S. have been relatively flat since the 1970s, Generation Recession may be the first in 30 years to see theirs actually fall.”

“Generation Recession”?  Give me a break. Why don’t we call every generation “Generation Recession,” then? Let’s look back at the words of Newsweek’s arch-rival and doppelganger, Time Magazine, as stated in an editorial on January 13, 1992:

“‘Whining’ hardly captures the extent of the gloom Americans feel as the current downturn enters its 18th month. The slump is the longest, if not the deepest, since the Great Depression. Traumatized by layoffs that have cost more than 1.2 million jobs during the slump, U.S. consumers have fallen into their deepest funk in years…. In one of history’s most painful paradoxes, U.S. consumers seem suddenly disillusioned with the American Dream of rising prosperity even as capitalism and democracy have consigned the Soviet Union to history’s trash heap. ‘I’m worried if my kids can earn a decent living and buy a house,’ says Tony Lentini, vice president of public affairs for Mitchell Energy in Houston. ‘I wonder if this will be the first generation that didn’t do better than their parents. There’s a genuine feeling that the country has gotten way off track, and neither political party has any answers. Americans don’t see any solutions.’”

You get the picture. The 1990-92 Great Recession had a lot of people really depressed. We had reached depths never seen before, and the future was bleak. But perhaps the worse recession in our generation occurred between the years 1974 and 1975, followed by another between 1980 and 1982. This was followed by the 1980s boom. Likewise, on the heels of the 1990-92 downturn, we had one of the most unprecedented periods of wealth creation in our history. And all in all, the early 2000s, while they had some major issues, weren’t too shabby from an economic perspective.

In the aftermath of the 1970s oil shocks and Great Recession, we were incessantly told that we entered an “era of diminished expectations.” Ditto for the Great Recession of the early 1980s, ditto for the Great Recession of the early 1990s. During each down cycle, it was ballyhooed as the worst of the worst, something from which we would never recover. Yet each period was followed by periods of incredible growth. As I’ve noted in previous posts, every downturn has shaken up the old order and created new patterns. The PC revolution emerged from the recession of 1980-1982; the Internet revolution from the recession of 1990-1991; and social media arose from the 2000-2002 post-dot-bomb recession. Given our past history, we may be on the verge of an economic boom based on factors we can’t even describe yet.

And what about those downtrodden youngsters whose worldview has been suppressed by cold economic realities? Sure, it’s harder for them to find jobs right now. And we’re going to see plenty of more articles like the Newsweek piece about the bleak future ahead for younger generations.

But the fact is, we actually have a young generation entering an era of unprecedented opportunity — and they know it. They connect to each other across the globe in ways unimaginable even to their older siblings — via social networking, accessing information and contacts via smartphones and other devices. When it comes to the power of information sharing and technology, they know no limits. And therein lies the roots of the next wave of opportunity.

 
Reply to Story

SmartPlanet TalkbackShare your ideas and expertise on this topic

Subscribe to this discussion via RSS

  •  
    1

    ronangel

    01/12/10 | Report as spam

    RE: Recession will make today's youngsters risk-averse... but don't tell them that

    Stop whining get out there and BUY something everyday your money is worth less in real terms. The trick is not to pay the asking price look at the market check prices on the internet then take a printout of the item (make sure in stock) to your local store tell them I will pay this price for item take it or leave it.If they say no go elsewhere. If everybody does this things will get going again,the store does not want to get stuck with goods by selling will be able to buy new stock AT LOWER PRICES using same principal selling again at lower prices then more people will buy.Depending on terms of lease should contact landlord explaining that if the rent is not reduced will have to find cheaper premises which will be available if things go on as they are.be prepared to take less wages freeze or commission on sales things will get better as prices drop & people have more goods which are worth more than money if bought at RIGHT price.

  •  
    2

    joel@...

    01/13/10 | Report as spam

    RE: Recession will make today's youngsters risk-averse... but don't tell them that

    Maybe it is time to stop using money altogether. It keeps us back from
    really letting go and creating what we desire.

  •  
    3

    LarryPTL

    01/13/10 | Report as spam

    Recessions come and go unless ...

    The government interferes. Democrat Roosevelt kept raising new taxes each time the economy began to pull itself out of the depression. Draining the lifeblood of the economy out of it, everything tanked. What should have been another minor recession turned into the greatest economic debacle in the history of mankind as a result of do-gooders who had no idea what they were doing playing god.

    The marketplace has self-correcting mechanisms in place if only the government would get out of the way and let things play out. Oh, the government can provide some small relief for the unmployed and under-employed, but for the most part, it shouldn't try and 'tweak' the economy.

    Government interference is not like a surgeon gently and delicately going in and correcting things that are wrong. Government is a blunt instrument with the tact of a bull in a china shop.

  •  
    4

    another ken

    01/13/10 | Report as spam

    RE: Recession will make today's youngsters risk-averse... but don't tell them that

    Joe McKendrick said: "Likewise, on the heels of the 1990-92 downturn, we had one of the most unprecedented periods of wealth creation in our history"

    Ummm... We sure have had an unprecedented period of wealth transfer. But wealth creation? I'm not so sure. Could you provide some evidence?

    I notice you didn't bother to comment about the lack of any significant growth in real income for the past three decades and the possibility of real declines going forward. How does your claim of "unprecedented ... wealth creation" jibe with no, or minimal, growth in real incomes? How does that work, exactly?

    ...ken...

  •  
    5

    cuhulin

    01/13/10 | Report as spam

    RE: Recession will make today's youngsters risk-averse... but don't tell them that

    LarryPTL,

    You really need to check your economic history before pushing the drivel about Rooseveltian taxes.

    The Great Depression started in 1929 -- the first year of the Hoover administration. The really severe numbers that get quoted about the Great Depression come a few years later, just as Roosevelt was running for reelection and starting into office. Had it been a normal recession (4 year cycle), it would have been in recovery long before Roosevelt had a chance to affect it.

  •  
    6

    hiraghm@...

    01/13/10 | Reported as spam

    Perspective

    My parents grew up during the depression, and they were hardly "risk averse" (my father served in Europe during WWII, for example of risk-taking).

    But, the new pravda seems to be about the mythical "74-75" great recession and the "80-82" great recession.

    BUT... as a teen in the 70s, I remember the hardest, most difficult to get over period being from 76-80 (Carter was President, the 70s equivalent of Obama without the charisma or popularity).

    Just as the current recession got its start in 2006 with the policies of the newly Democrat controlled Congress, the 80-82 "recession" got its start in the late 70s.

    Double digit inflation, double digit interest rates, insane tax rates for businesses, national "malaise", yet another President and Congress trying to make us "just another nation". That was the late 70s for me.

    It's worse than deja vu; it's like I've been sentenced back to the deepest depths of hell.

  •  
    7

    Joe McKendrick

    01/13/10 | Report as spam

    Wealth creation in the 1990s

    to: another ken:

    Ken: Thanks for the questions. An index that reflects wealth creation (albiet inperfectly) is the stock market, which reflects GDP growth.

    In the 1990s, the market (Dow Jones Index) grew from about 2,700 to 11,500, or by about 325%. By contrast, during the 1960s, considered another economic growth period, the DJI grew from about 650 to 950, just under 50% expansion.

  •  
    8

    lehnerus2000

    01/13/10 | Report as spam

    RE: Recession will make today's youngsters risk-averse... but don't tell them that

    The problems are being caused by unrestrained speculation (remember $150 barrels of Oil). Speculative markets all seem to be based on "Positive Feedback". If you've worked with electronics, you would know that causes uncontrollable oscillations ("Booms and Busts").

    I agree with "another ken".

    The Stock Market bears almost no relationship to actual value, only the value that speculators attach to companies. A company can be worth $200/share one day and $50/share the next even if there have been no disasters.

    People say, "isn't it awful that people spend their OWN money on lottery tickets." You never hear people say, "isn't it awful that stock traders spend OTHER PEOPLE'S money on share trades."

    lehnerus2000

  •  
    9

    IslandBoy_77

    01/15/10 | Report as spam

    Not risk averse - work averse...

    I don't see the "kid on the street" in the US, but the average "kid on the street" in New Zealand is lazy, "entitled", has no concept of handling money properly, and is quite happy to run up massive debt to keep themselves "entertained". I would say that the last 2-3 generations have been quite happy with "risk" - so long as they can blame someone else when it all turns to custard. The "recession generation" looks to be just the same type of mindset as previous 2-3 "cousins": technologically aware, yet "isolated" (think kids texting each other across the room or sitting next to each other...) with poor interpersonal skills, a huge entitlement chip on their shoulder, and a "blame everyone else for the mess" attitude. It's only those of us in the 40+ group that hold it all together for the younger ones (at least in the "west") - we still know how to work an 8-12 hour day, pay our bills, save money, talk to people and think by ourselves (instead of letting the loony left media / politicians do it for us).

The following tags are supported in Smartplanet comments:
<b></b> <i></i> <u></u> <pre></pre>

Leave a Reply

  1. Name: You are currently: a Guest |
advertisement

Quick Poll

advertisement

Heather Clancy

Heather Clancy is an award-winning business journalist with a passion for green technology and corporate sustainability issues. Her articles have appeared in Entrepreneur, Fortune Small Business, The International Herald Tribune and The New York Times. In a past corporate life, Heather was editor of Computer Reseller News, where she was a featured speaker about everything from software as a service to IT security to mobile computing.

Heather started her journalism life as a business writer with United Press International in New York. She holds a B.A. in English literature from McGill University in Montreal, Quebec, and has a thing for Lewis Carroll. When she’s not hunting for a great green story, she’s singing a cappella or scuba-diving with her husband, Joe.

Heather Clancy

Writing publicly about what the high-tech industry is actually doing to help itself and the world get greener or more sustainable is one way I figure I can contribute more meaningfully to said effort. I'm also a big OMG-kind-of-fan of smart leadership, which is why the goodly folks who publish this blog let me go on about this topic and why I am always on the hunt for forward-looking business management ideas.

My daily writing is focused on looking for topics for my blogs, GreenTech Pastures and Business Brains. I also write often about emerging technology trends such as mobile computing, unified communications and cloud computing. Occasionally, I will pop up at an industry conference in some sort of speaking capacity. In cases where a speaking engagement involves a sponsor that may be covered in this blog, that fact will be disclosed in coverage as appropriate.

My corporate writing work usually consists of crafting research white papers about some aspect of technology. In the event that my commentary (in written, audio or video form) mentions a company for which I have provided consulting advice, I will disclose that fact. However, there is no connection between these projects and the topics that I'm covering in my blog.

Joe McKendrick

Joe McKendrick is an author and independent analyst who tracks the impact of information technology on management and markets. Joe is also SOA community manager for ebizQ, and speaks frequently on Enterprise 2.0 and SOA topics at industry events and Webcasts. He also serves as lead analyst and author of Evans Data Corp.'s highly regarded bi-annual SOA/Web Services and Web 2.0 surveys. Joe writes a regular column for Database Trends & Applications, and has authored numerous research reports in partnership with Unisphere Research for user groups such as SHARE, Oracle Applications Users Group, and International DB2 Users Group. In a previous life, Joe served as director of the Administrative Management Society (AMS), an international professional association dedicated to advancing knowledge within the IT and business management fields.

Joe McKendrick

Joe McKendrick is an independent consultant and editor. Joe has performed project work for the following companies in the IT marketspace: IBM, Systinet/HP, Teradata. He has performed project work for the following organizations in partnership with Unisphere Research (Unisphere Media): IBM, Oracle Corp., International Oracle Users Group, Oracle Applications Users Group, Professional Association for SQL Server, International DB2 Users Group, International Sybase Users Group.

Business Brains focuses on management issues that revolve around the key question: How do I make my business, family, and coworkers smarter? The blog examines the management issues facing a variety of businesses and debunks the technology you need to know