Moore’s Law: no end in sight for processing power doubling

By Joe McKendrick | Sep 24, 2009 |

The reason our society and economy have become so rapidly and thoroughly digitized in recent years is that the underlying computer processors have been able to keep up, and exceed, all the workloads we’ve thrown at them. It’s Moore’s Law in action. But will there be a point of diminishing growth in processing power?

In 1965, Gordon Moore, co-founder of Intel, postulated that that number of transistors that can be placed on an integrated circuit — and thus processing power — would double every two years.

The rest of the story is the stuff of computer industry legend. It turned out that Moore was right on the money, and the processing power of semiconductors keeps outpacing the workloads we put on them — from high-volume transaction processing to simulations to graphics. At the same time, the form factors that support these applications keep getting smaller and smaller.

But is there a physical limit to how many transistors a minuscule circuit can support? In recent years, however, observers have speculated that we may be near the end of Moore’s Law, at least as it applies to silicon-based processors.

Intel CTO Justin Rattner recently pooh-poohed such speculation, stating in an interview with Network World that Moore’s Law will likely be the rule for many decades to come. “If Moore’s Law is simply a measure of the increase in the number of electronic devices per chip, then Moore’s Law has much more time to go, probably decades,” he is quoted as saying. The future remains in silicon for a long time to come, he adds.

Still, new constructs of processor technology are emerging. For example, IBM announced last month that its scientists, in conjunction with CalTech, developed a method of using DNA molecules as scaffolding — where millions of carbon nanotubes could be deposited and self-assembled into precise patterns by sticking to the DNA molecules. This scaffolding may help enable processors to be etched into surfaces with less than 22 nanometers of space — the current physical barrier of space for cramming transistors on a circuit.

In the silicon world, Intel has already moved from a 45-nanometer construct to a 32-nanometer construct for its processors. The chipmaker also recently unveiled its own plans to crack the 22-nanometer barrier, announcing plans to release the 22-nanometer processors toward the end of 2011.

So, every year, we’ll be packing even more and more power on even tinier chips. Is it just a matter of time before we’re carrying around mainframes within our smartphones?

 
Reply to Story

SmartPlanet TalkbackShare your ideas and expertise on this topic

Subscribe to this discussion via RSS

  •  
    1

    DanaBlankenhorn

    09/24/09 | Report as spam

    Gee, sounds like my book

    I have been saying this for years, and wrote a book in 2002 (The Blankenhorn Effect) predicting that, even though Gordon Moore himself was saying there were limits. I recently updated the book as Moore's Lore and I'm looking for an electronic publisher. But the prediction still holds. Good to see Intel coming around on it.

  •  
    2

    misceng

    09/25/09 | Report as spam

    RE: Moore's Law: no end in sight for processing power doubling

    Though Moore's Law may hold for longer than expected, it does not mean
    that computing power will expand at the same rate from the point of view of
    the user. Too often the expanded capabilities of the computer are
    absorbed in the ever increasing bloat of software. I have seen little
    increase in the rate at which I can do work over the last five years and
    others seem to have the same experience.

  •  
    3

    oicur12ok

    09/25/09 | Report as spam

    RE: Moore's Law: no end in sight for processing power doubling

    Long live Moore's Law!

  •  
    4

    adornoe@...

    09/25/09 | Report as spam

    Moore's law could conceivably last forever...


    as long as Intel and other think that they have to prove Moore's "law" correct.

    When the chip can no longer be "stretched" to hold more "transistors" and/or more memory, all that's needed is to place two of those cpus/memory modules together and, presto, double the power in a computer. And then, a couple years later, all they need to do is to create a computer with four cpus and four memory modules on the same chip and... magic!.... the power of the computer has again doubled.

    What? That's what they're doing now? How dare they cheat!

  •  
    5

    jschlesinger@...

    09/29/09 | Report as spam

    RE: Moore's Law: no end in sight for processing power doubling

    Although the number of transistors on a chip can increase indefinitely, the truth is that Moore's Law as commonly interpreted failed about five years ago. That is, the processing power of a single CPU stopped growing. The maximum single processor speed has not increased since then. Recent chips have increased the number of threads (simultaneous multiprocessing) or the number of cores but have not been able to increase the speed. This is for two reason: the heat dissipation of the chip; and the gate delay across the chip. The latter is the main problem. To make the CPU faster, the clock pulse has to be shorter (except in asynchronous CPUs, which we don't seem able to make). But the gate delay limits the number of transistors available for a clock pulse. There seems to be no way out of this problem.

  •  
    6

    yeoman

    09/29/09 | Report as spam

    RE: Moore's Law: no end in sight for processing power doubling

    ?Is it just a matter of time before we?re carrying around mainframes within our smartphones??
    Who wrote this? The smartphone is already many times more powerful than the first mainframes I worked on years ago that had 8kb to 32kb of memory! The only thing it cannot do is chew up boxes of continuous stationery. Regrettably it is also true that software bloat (and inherited software inefficiencies and bugs - e.g.,Windows) means the gains are only 1000 times instead of 1,000,000 times. Human begins are very poor at learning from other people?s mistakes, and our capabilities do not double every 18 months.

  •  
    7

    Joe McKendrick

    10/10/09 | Report as spam

    RE: Moore's Law: no end in sight for processing power doubling

    Re: yeoman: "The smartphone is already many times more powerful than the first mainframes I worked on years ago that had 8kb to 32kb of memory!" Thanks for that clarification -- it just illustrates how far our capabilities have come!

The following tags are supported in Smartplanet comments:
<b></b> <i></i> <u></u> <pre></pre>

Leave a Reply

  1. Name: You are currently: a Guest |
advertisement

Quick Poll

advertisement
Click Here
advertisement
Click Here
advertisement

Heather Clancy

Heather Clancy is an award-winning business journalist in the New York area with more than 20 years experience covering the high-tech industry. She has a passion for green IT and regularly covers business technology issues and trends. Her articles have appeared in Entrepreneur, Fortune Small Business, The International Herald Tribune and The New York Times.

Clancy previously was editor at Computer Reseller News, the leading B2B trade publication covering news and trends about high-tech channels of distribution. In that role, she set editorial direction and led a staff of close to 30.

While at CRN, Clancy was the featured speaker on dozens of video netseminars, covering a wide range of topics including Software as a Service, managed services, convergence, IT security, mobile computing and high-tech channel program strategy. She has moderated numerous conference panel discussions and roundtables, and frequently was rated the top session facilitator at CMP Media's XChange conferences.

Prior to joining CRN, Clancy was a business writer with United Press International, where she covered everything from corporate mergers to the early days of the high-tech industry. She holds a B.A. in English literature from McGill University in Montreal, Quebec, and is a graduate of the Stanford Professional Publishing Course.

Heather Clancy

I’m sure cynical investigative reporters would discover that my lifestyle is about as sustainable as the average American, which is to say not so much. But I try. Really hard. Honest. And writing publicly about what the high-tech industry is actually doing to get greener or more sustainable is one way I figure I can contribute more meaningfully to the effort. I’m also a big OMG-kind-of-fan of smart leadership, which is why the goodly folks who publish this blog let me go on about this topic and why I am always on the hunt for forward-looking business management ideas.

My freelance hours are focused on looking for topics for my blogs, GreenTech Pastures and Business Brains, and writing articles for mainstream publication. I also contribute articles and blogs about VARs, resellers and systems integrators that deploy IT solutions for media company Tech Target. Occasionally, I’ll pop up at an industry conference in some sort of speaking capacity. In cases where a speaking engagement involves a sponsor that may be covered in this blog, this will be disclosed in coverage as appropriate.

My consulting activities include a relationship with SWOT Management Group, a firm in New Jersey that provides high-tech channel strategy and sales engagement insight to high-tech vendors. In the event that my commentary (in written, audio or video form) mentions a company for which I have provided consulting advice, I will disclose that fact. However, there is no connection between these projects and the topics that I’m covering in my blog.

Joe McKendrick

Joe McKendrick is an author and independent analyst who tracks the impact of information technology on management and markets. Joe is also SOA community manager for ebizQ, and speaks frequently on Enterprise 2.0 and SOA topics at industry events and Webcasts. He also serves as lead analyst and author of Evans Data Corp.'s highly regarded bi-annual SOA/Web Services and Web 2.0 surveys. Joe writes a regular column for Database Trends & Applications, and has authored numerous research reports in partnership with Unisphere Research for user groups such as SHARE, Oracle Applications Users Group, and International DB2 Users Group. In a previous life, Joe served as director of the Administrative Management Society (AMS), an international professional association dedicated to advancing knowledge within the IT and business management fields.

Joe McKendrick

Joe McKendrick is an independent consultant and editor. Joe has performed project work for the following companies in the IT marketspace: IBM, Systinet/HP, Teradata. He has performed project work for the following organizations in partnership with Unisphere Research (Unisphere Media): IBM, Oracle Corp., International Oracle Users Group, Oracle Applications Users Group, Professional Association for SQL Server, International DB2 Users Group, International Sybase Users Group.
Business Brains focuses on management issues that revolve around the key question: How do I make my business, family, and coworkers smarter? The blog examines the management issues facing a variety of businesses and debunks the technology you need to know