Bird with baguette 1; Big Bang 0

By Joe McKendrick | Nov 7, 2009 |

Call it the matchup between the Higgs boson and a bread crumb. And the bread crumb seems to have prevailed in this round.

The $6.5-billion Large Hadron Collider (LHC) in Switzerland — which is supposed to prove the existence of the Higgs boson, or “God particle,” which gives matter in the universe its mass and simulate the Big Bang — apparently was no match for a small bird with a bread crumb.

It seems the folks running the LHC had to postpone their plans last week to emulate the universe’s Big Bang because of a piece of baguette. According to a news report, LHC — “designed to recreate the conditions present at the beginning of time — had to be switched off after a bird dropped a bit of baguette into it, causing it to overheat.”

The bird allegedly dropped the bread crumb on a compensating capacitor – where the main electricity supply enters the collider – cutting power to the LHC during a test run.

Nice to see nature still knows how to keep us humble. The lesson is that even the most thoroughly and painstakingly laid plans — and grandest visions (in this case, uncovering the origin of the universe) — can be tripped up by the most unexpected and down-to-earth things. Then again, maybe more organizations could use birds with bread crumbs to make decision makers think twice about pouring money into mega-expensive black-hole projects.

 
Reply to Story

SmartPlanet TalkbackShare your ideas and expertise on this topic

Subscribe to this discussion via RSS

  •  
    1

    Mabrick

    11/09/09 | Report as spam

    RE: Bird with baguette 1; Big Bang 0

    Maybe they should just buy a shotgun instead.

  •  
    2

    abbiesomeone

    11/09/09 | Report as spam

    RE: Bird with baguette 1; Big Bang 0

    > pouring money into mega-expensive black-hole projects

    Hey, stick to the "biz" stuff. You're clearly out of your depth when it comes to science.

  •  
    3

    konkreet

    11/10/09 | Report as spam

    Out of depth?

    @ abbiesomone
    One does not need a pocket protector and a lab coat to decide whether spending billions of dollars on "proving" an esoterical question like "is there a God particle". It's like all the arguments about space exploration - are there benefits? Yes. Are they worth the money considering what that money might otherwise be used for? No. I liken it to someone buying a 100" wide-screen OLED TV, while their children run around in rag, eat out of garbage cans, and are sick all the time. Nothing wrong with the TV, everything wrong with the priorities.

    It is true that we "need" to keep moving forward. But since we clearly haven't even got something as basic as looking after one another on a daily basis (food, clothing, housing, hope, security, job prospects and decent education), then farting about with theoretical stuff that MAY be useful for SOMETHING some time in the distant FUTURE is a waste of time, money and focus. All the technology in the world is useless if a society is in chaos (which on the whole the world-wide societies are)...

  •  
    4

    donnydo77@...

    11/10/09 | Report as spam

    Computer Science has it's "bug" now particle physics has it's ...

    analogous malfunction.

  •  
    5

    gwaddell

    11/16/09 | Report as spam

    hyperbole is ineffectual when you don't know the details

    @konkreet:
    No, a pocket protector and lab coat are optional. Perspective is important. Yes, the cost for big, long-vision projects is large, but it is still a small cost in comparison with other budget items. Pure and natural sciences are foundation of developments 30 or 40 or more years afterward. Consider NASA's 2010 budget ($18.686 billion. Source: www.nasa.gov/news/budget/index.html). Huge. USA's 2010 budget request? 3.552 trillion (source: http://www.whitehouse.gov/omb/assets/fy2010_new_era/Summary_Tables2.pdf ). That's 3652 billion. Nasa represents 0.52606981%. Is half a percent of your tax dollar too much?

    Other programs to consider: Social Security, Medicare, Medicaid: $ 1438 billion (source: ibid).

    I think you are right to want better results from social programs. Remember though, Medicare/Medicaid wouldn't have much success if medicines and medical technology were never funded. X-Rays didn't have many practical applications outside of pure science at first, as an example. It would have been hard to convince an investor back then to pony up $$ so that 100 years later we can print circuit boards using techniques adopted from that advance.

    PalmPirate

  •  
    6

    gwaddell

    11/16/09 | Report as spam

    typo

The following tags are supported in Smartplanet comments:
<b></b> <i></i> <u></u> <pre></pre>

Leave a Reply

  1. Name: You are currently: a Guest |
advertisement

Quick Poll

advertisement

Heather Clancy

Heather Clancy is an award-winning business journalist with a passion for green technology and corporate sustainability issues. Her articles have appeared in Entrepreneur, Fortune Small Business, The International Herald Tribune and The New York Times. In a past corporate life, Heather was editor of Computer Reseller News, where she was a featured speaker about everything from software as a service to IT security to mobile computing.

Heather started her journalism life as a business writer with United Press International in New York. She holds a B.A. in English literature from McGill University in Montreal, Quebec, and has a thing for Lewis Carroll. When she’s not hunting for a great green story, she’s singing a cappella or scuba-diving with her husband, Joe.

Heather Clancy

Writing publicly about what the high-tech industry is actually doing to help itself and the world get greener or more sustainable is one way I figure I can contribute more meaningfully to said effort. I'm also a big OMG-kind-of-fan of smart leadership, which is why the goodly folks who publish this blog let me go on about this topic and why I am always on the hunt for forward-looking business management ideas.

My daily writing is focused on looking for topics for my blogs, GreenTech Pastures and Business Brains. I also write often about emerging technology trends such as mobile computing, unified communications and cloud computing. Occasionally, I will pop up at an industry conference in some sort of speaking capacity. In cases where a speaking engagement involves a sponsor that may be covered in this blog, that fact will be disclosed in coverage as appropriate.

My corporate writing work usually consists of crafting research white papers about some aspect of technology. In the event that my commentary (in written, audio or video form) mentions a company for which I have provided consulting advice, I will disclose that fact. However, there is no connection between these projects and the topics that I'm covering in my blog.

Joe McKendrick

Joe McKendrick is an author and independent analyst who tracks the impact of information technology on management and markets. Joe is also SOA community manager for ebizQ, and speaks frequently on Enterprise 2.0 and SOA topics at industry events and Webcasts. He also serves as lead analyst and author of Evans Data Corp.'s highly regarded bi-annual SOA/Web Services and Web 2.0 surveys. Joe writes a regular column for Database Trends & Applications, and has authored numerous research reports in partnership with Unisphere Research for user groups such as SHARE, Oracle Applications Users Group, and International DB2 Users Group. In a previous life, Joe served as director of the Administrative Management Society (AMS), an international professional association dedicated to advancing knowledge within the IT and business management fields.

Joe McKendrick

Joe McKendrick is an independent consultant and editor. Joe has performed project work for the following companies in the IT marketspace: IBM, Systinet/HP, Teradata. He has performed project work for the following organizations in partnership with Unisphere Research (Unisphere Media): IBM, Oracle Corp., International Oracle Users Group, Oracle Applications Users Group, Professional Association for SQL Server, International DB2 Users Group, International Sybase Users Group.

Business Brains focuses on management issues that revolve around the key question: How do I make my business, family, and coworkers smarter? The blog examines the management issues facing a variety of businesses and debunks the technology you need to know