Follow this blog:
RSS

Chevy Volt outsells Nissan Leaf, Prius Plug-in in May

By | June 4, 2012, 3:30 AM PDT

U.S. automaker General Motors chalked up a victory over its Asian counterparts last week in the U.S.’ electric vehicle market, as its Chevy Volt outsold both the Toyota Prius Plug-in and the Nissan Leaf.

GM’s rechargeable model sold 1,680 units in May, three times more than the same period last year, when it sold only 481 units. Meanwhile, Toyota sold 1,086 Prius Plug-ins, while Nissan’s Leaf dropped 55 percent on last year, selling only 510 units.

According to Autonews, the Volt’s sales rose after a production halt earlier this year, following a sales slowdown in the wake of reports of battery-pack fires after crash tests. Production picked up again in April, with the necessary safety modifications. Sales were also aided by changes that allowed the Volt to qualify for rebates, as well as new carpool lane access in California, the country’s biggest EV market.

The Nissan Leaf has been struggling with availability issues, now that it is for sale in all 50 American states. Whereas some markets are well stocked, said Al Castignetti, vice president for North American sales, others have no units available. He predicted sales would hit at least 1,000 by July.

For the year to date, the Volt has sold 7,057 units, compared to 3,638 Prius Plug-ins and 2,513 Leafs. The Volt starts at $39,145, compared to the Prius plug-in ($32,000) and the Leaf ($35,200), before applicable tax credits.

Photo: GM

via [Autonews]

Start your week smarter with our weekly e-mail newsletter. It's your cheat sheet for good ideas. Get it.

Channtal Fleischfresser

About Channtal Fleischfresser

Channtal Fleischfresser is a contributing editor for SmartPlanet.

Channtal Fleischfresser

Channtal Fleischfresser

Contributing Editor

Channtal Fleischfresser has worked for The Economist, WNET/Channel 13, Al Jazeera English, Wall Street Journal and Associated Press. She holds degrees from the University of Pennsylvania and the Columbia University Graduate School of Journalism. She is based in New York.

Follow her on Twitter.

Channtal Fleischfresser

Channtal Fleischfresser

Channtal does not have financial holdings that would influence how or what she covers.

She writes for SmartPlanet and is not an employee of CBS.

If you liked this, don't miss...
18
Comments

Join the conversation!

Follow via:
RSS
0 Votes
+ -
Not exactly setting the car world on fire.
I would say the electrical grid is still safe from a meltdown with anemic sales figures like that. If I were to buy anyone one of these vehicles, it would be the Prius.
Posted by philwhite42@...
4th Jun 2012
+2 Votes
+ -
Hybrid plugins
For $40,000, I can drive to work and back without using any gasoline.

For$18,000, I can drive a Kia Soul to work and back at 27 mpg, and use my $22,000 savings to buy gasoline for a very, very long time.

http://media.zenfs.com/en_us/News/ucomics.com/payn120519.gif
Posted by bb_apptix
4th Jun 2012
0 Votes
+ -
It's not about saving money.
Anyway, 28 mpg stinks.
Posted by ARzondzinska
Updated - 4th Jun 2012
+1 Vote
+ -
That much is true.
It's about looking politically correct, largely funded with other people's money.
Posted by JohnMcGrew@...
Updated - 4th Jun 2012
+1 Vote
+ -
Yeah...but
you're still burning petroleum. And I don't care whether you believe in AGW or not, pollution reduction should be non-controversial.
Posted by TryThinking
4th Jun 2012
+1 Vote
+ -
Electric cars create pollution as well
The pollution caused by gasoline cars is a fraction of what it was decades ago. It's certainly no longer worth outlawing them to get rid of it.

And electric cars create pollution and put carbon in the air by the coal and natural gas plants which create much more than half this country's electricity.
Posted by zackers
5th Jun 2012
0 Votes
+ -
Who is outlawing gasoline cars?
Not here in the U.S. We have solar panels, which more than pay for themselves in a few years, so we aren't creating any pollution to power our Volt.
Posted by Pixel_Dude
5th Jun 2012
0 Votes
+ -
27MPG, is not something to boast about
IMHO. I have a 2009, Ford Focus, and with the 5 spd manual transmission, I get rountinely 38-40 MPG. I've been quite happy with it, for a car that only cost me around $12K, using the cash for klunkers program
Posted by T-Wrench
11th Jun 2012
+1 Vote
+ -
Apples and Oranges
The Nissan Leaf is all electric (no gas engine to regenerate with). The Volt and Prius Plug in are not.

The Volt is available in all 50 states. The Prius Plug-in is only available in 15 (and only 3 of the top ten in population). When the Prius is available in all states next year and continues to be thousands of dollars cheaper, I expect the Volt to get spanked.

This will probably be a short lived "victory"
Posted by sullivanjc
4th Jun 2012
0 Votes
+ -
The victory is reduced oil usage
Why make it into a contest between hybrids, pure electrics, and Plug-ins? The Volt's a great car (I own one).
Posted by Pixel_Dude
5th Jun 2012
0 Votes
+ -
small steps forward
Although the sales figures are nothing to write home about, anything having to do with new auto technology like this has a potentially long adoption curve. Let's remember that the proven internal combustion engine has been around a long time. Future fuel prices will to some degree determine demand.

Plus people are nervous about the battery life and replacement cost. Yeah, the $7,500 federal tax credit is a bonus but the cars are necessarily small, and when you think about toting around kids, dogs, and space for all the stuff you buy at Costco, Home Depot, many are still opting for a minivan or SUV.

Hybrids seem to be the more popular choice (for now) among the environmentally-conscious crowd. After all, budgets matter too, and the sticker shock experienced by some towards the Volt and other HEVs turn people towards other options.
Posted by wally_altoona
4th Jun 2012
+1 Vote
+ -
Nothing new here
Electric vehicles are nothing new. They were around at the beginning of the automotive age, but never caught on, other than on a golf course.
Posted by philwhite42@...
4th Jun 2012
+2 Votes
+ -
Reduce petroleum use
The point is to reduce consumption of petroleum. That will minimize the $$$ going to the Middle East and reduce generation of CO2. 27 MPG will not do that.
Posted by johnkes
4th Jun 2012
-1 Votes
+ -
Right on
yes, that and avoid poisoning the Gulf of Mexico, Alaska, and California. Get a Volt, and get solar panels too.
Posted by Pixel_Dude
5th Jun 2012
+1 Vote
+ -
You do have a point, but until they can
roll out Electric Vehicle chargers all over the US, and this means rural areas as well, these cars will only appeal to city dwellers, not to people who live 25 -50 miles from where they work.

Until then, I'll take a car like the Focus that gets up to 40 MPG any day of the week over electric.
Posted by T-Wrench
11th Jun 2012
0 Votes
+ -
So much opinion, so little fact
I own one. I use about 8 gallons of gas a month (I'm an average driver). We have solar panels - our electricity is nearly free - we're using essentially no fossil fuel for it. The car is not small - lots of room for luggage, groceries, larger loads with the rear seats down. No repairs needed in 17 months of ownership. I love to drive it - fast, quiet, great handling. No one else subsidized my purchase of it. Yes, pure electrics pollute less, but they can't drive 400 miles on one "tank" in my Volt like I can.
Posted by Pixel_Dude
5th Jun 2012
0 Votes
+ -
Efficiency
I own a 2011 Ford Fiesta. Gives me between 34 to 36 MPGs. It cost me $16,000. I saved over $10,000 when compared to a Prius (hybrid, regular model). The money the Prius would have saved me during the 6 years, on gas, doesn't justify the extra $10,000 it costs. You also have the issue with battery, and maintenance is also a heavy burden to overcome. It's all about economics. Until these vehicles can come to a point of almost the same price as a similarly equipped and size vehicle, sales will not be significant.

Also, for purely electric cars, until there are plenty of charge stations, and charging time can be reduced to about 1 hour (who want's to wait hours until the car is charged), then adoption will be insiginificant. They either need to last for more than 100 miles on a full charge and/or charge in 1 hour less (let's say you forgot to charge overnight, and you go to work stop at a station to charge, you don't want to wait for hours).

I think the best option in the USA is to start making more models that use diesel and turbo technologies. A turbine can increase efficiency over 30% average on a 4 cylinder vehicle. Cost of adding a turbine to most vehicles is not that expensive. I would have certainly payed $1 or $2K additionally for my Fiesta if it had a turbine and gave another 10MPGs.In the UK I saw vehicles that used diesel and got over 70MPGs. Sure diesel is a bit more expensive, but at those efficiencies, it saves a lot of $s.
Posted by ahpitre
11th Jun 2012
0 Votes
+ -
Prius C is $19000 and 50 MPG
First of all the Ford Fiesta is a car which rest of the world buys in large numbers except in USA, which somehow people hate eventhough it is less pricy and has higher mileage. So congrats for using this car.

On the other hand, Prius C costs only $19000, provides 54 MPG in higways and 47 MPG in cities. I am sure you can get that $3000 extra back in the gallons that you save while driving the car. Add that to extra bonuses of less oil from OPEC and better air.
Posted by optimisticIdiot
18th Jun 2012
Join the conversation
Formatting +
BB Codes - Note: HTML is not supported in forums
  • [b] Bold [/b]
  • [i] Italic [/i]
  • [u] Underline [/u]
  • [s] Strikethrough [/s]
  • [q] "Quote" [/q]
  • [ol][*] 1. Ordered List [/ol]
  • [ul][*] · Unordered List [/ul]
  • [pre] Preformat [/pre]
  • [quote] "Blockquote" [/quote]

Join the SmartPlanet community and join the conversation! Signing up is fast and free. Don't wait -- we want to hear your opinion!