Follow this blog:
RSS

California to consider a more stringent electric vehicle mandate

By | January 26, 2012, 3:31 PM PST

The California Air Resources Board (CARB) is expected to vote this week on revisions to the state’s zero-emissions targets for 2025. Current rules mandate that by 2025 four percent of vehicles sold in the state be battery-electric or fuel-cell cars or plug-in hybrids.

The proposed rules would increase that requirement from four to 15 percent. According to CARB, these types of cars would account for one in seven new vehicles sold in 2025. By the middle of the century, 87 percent of cars using California’s state roads would have to be zero-emissions.

CARB argues that such stringent measures would lead to a 52 million ton reduction in climate emissions by 2025.

But not everyone supports the measure, and some fear that mandating automakers to produce cleaner cars won’t necessarily sway consumer tastes.

“Mandates can leave cars unsold on dealers’ lots,” said Gloria Bergquist, a spokeswoman for the Alliance of Automobile Manufacturers. “There’s always a certain ‘Field of Dreams’ thinking with regulations like this: ‘If you build it, they will come,’” she said.

Indeed, recent surveys have shown that consumer preferences, particularly among younger car owners, heavily favor hybrid cars over their zero-emissions counterparts. So mandating an increase in production of EVs would not necessarily increase their popularity among consumers.

While the immediate decision will only affect California, the state is often a bellwether for fuel-economy standards, so the board’s decision could have an indirect effect on regulations in other states as well.

Photo: Chevrolet

via [New York Times]

Start your week smarter with our weekly e-mail newsletter. It's your cheat sheet for good ideas. Get it.

Channtal Fleischfresser

About Channtal Fleischfresser

Channtal Fleischfresser is a contributing editor for SmartPlanet.

Channtal Fleischfresser

Channtal Fleischfresser

Contributing Editor

Channtal Fleischfresser has worked for The Economist, WNET/Channel 13, Al Jazeera English, Wall Street Journal and Associated Press. She holds degrees from the University of Pennsylvania and the Columbia University Graduate School of Journalism. She is based in New York.

Follow her on Twitter.

Channtal Fleischfresser

Channtal Fleischfresser

Channtal does not have financial holdings that would influence how or what she covers.

She writes for SmartPlanet and is not an employee of CBS.

If you liked this, don't miss...
6
Comments

Join the conversation!

Follow via:
RSS
+1 Vote
+ -
We Need Battery-Swap and Quick Charging Stations
I have a 120-mile round trip daily commute but would still consider an electric car for its lower cost per mile and less pollution. Today's batteries would require twice-daily charging. Better Place hasn't installed quick-swap stations in California and we need fast chargers at workplaces.
Posted by radiovan@...
27th Jan 2012
+2 Votes
+ -
Fantasyland
This is from the state that thinks a $100 billion high-speed train to nowhere is a good idea worthy of taxpayer support.
Posted by zackers
27th Jan 2012
+1 Vote
+ -
too many mandates
people need freedom.
Posted by dnbwise@...
27th Jan 2012
+1 Vote
+ -
USE OFFSET CREDIT TRADING
The emission trading system used to control SO2 emissions is based on offset credit trading. Power plants with emissions per kWh below target are awarded credits (depending on how far below). Power plants with above target emissions have to buy these credits off the low emission generators to offset their higher emissions. The result is that average emissions stay on target and it is up power companies to decide to reduce emissions or buy credits.
A similar system could be used to control the average emissions per mile of new cars. See http://pragmatusj.blogspot.com/2011/08/using-offset-credit-trading-to-drive.html for more details
Posted by John R Davidson
27th Jan 2012
+1 Vote
+ -
But there's two sides
I'd love to go with an all electric - but they're plain expensive. If our economy was rolling in extra money I'd understand why creating these laws makes sense but with more families and people having a harder time making ends meet this simply doesn't make sense. Of course we want cleaner air all all the other good stuff electric cars brings but first we've got to clean up our national budget so we can afford it. Once electric cars sell for a price an average person can afford I'm sure we'll flock to this common sense transportation.
Posted by bobinmo1
29th Jan 2012
+1 Vote
+ -
When is the lottery?
Will California have a lottery to pick the people forced into an EV when they do not sell enough to make the mandate?

Will taxpayers then foot the bill?
Posted by Hates Idiots
30th Jan 2012
Join the conversation
Formatting +
BB Codes - Note: HTML is not supported in forums
  • [b] Bold [/b]
  • [i] Italic [/i]
  • [u] Underline [/u]
  • [s] Strikethrough [/s]
  • [q] "Quote" [/q]
  • [ol][*] 1. Ordered List [/ol]
  • [ul][*] · Unordered List [/ul]
  • [pre] Preformat [/pre]
  • [quote] "Blockquote" [/quote]

Join the SmartPlanet community and join the conversation! Signing up is fast and free. Don't wait -- we want to hear your opinion!